Ben Bangert wrote:
So has the getting started and related documentation ported to version
1.0?
I've gone through and updated it, yes. If there's any remaining bugs,
please let me know.
Yes... please see
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss/msg/ce1aae631baa6ca0
I understand that
On May 30, 2010, at 12:41 AM, Krishnakant Mane wrote:
> I am particularly interested to know about the performance bennifits.
It's slightly faster, how much so varies on templates used, etc. Here are some
of the specific performance improvements:
- url instead of url_for. url_for used a singlet
On May 30, 2010, at 8:38 AM, Krishnakant Mane wrote:
> So has the getting started and related documentation ported to version 1.0?
I've gone through and updated it, yes. If there's any remaining bugs, please
let me know.
Cheers,
Ben
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to t
So has the getting started and related documentation ported to version 1.0?
Happy hacking.
Krishnakant.
On Sunday 30 May 2010 02:51 PM, Evgeny wrote:
As far as I read changelog, the point of 1.0 is not performance.
But rather cleaner architecture, decreased magic.
You can read changelogs here:
As far as I read changelog, the point of 1.0 is not performance.
But rather cleaner architecture, decreased magic.
You can read changelogs here:
http://pylonshq.com/articles/archives/2010/5/pylons_10_released
On May 30, 10:41 am, Krishnakant Mane wrote:
> Hello all.
> I went through the news po
Hello all.
I went through the news posting about the release of version 1.0 but did
not find any section describing the exact advantages of version 1 over
the previous versions.
I am particularly interested to know about the performance bennifits.
I understand that pylons uses many other compon
