On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2013, Robert Muir wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Andi Vajda wrote:
>>>
>>> I then found that the test case from hell, TestSort.java, has majorly
>>> changed again and test_Sort.py needs to be ported again. Sigh.
>
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013, Robert Muir wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Andi Vajda wrote:
I then found that the test case from hell, TestSort.java, has majorly
changed again and test_Sort.py needs to be ported again. Sigh.
Andi..
I'm not laughing at your expense Andi... but this made me l
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Andi Vajda wrote:
> I then found that the test case from hell, TestSort.java, has majorly
> changed again and test_Sort.py needs to be ported again. Sigh.
>
> Andi..
I'm not laughing at your expense Andi... but this made me laugh out
loud multiple times today.
I'
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013, Thomas Koch wrote:
Hi Andi, You're right - and API docs are wrong. Actually both must have
change after 4.1 release: I checked the source of java-lucene v4.1
(lucene-4.1.0-src.tgz / 21-Jan-2013) and it matches the online javadocs.
So I guess you're preparing for PyLucene
Hi Andi,
You're right - and API docs are wrong. Actually both must have change after 4.1
release: I checked the source of java-lucene v4.1 (lucene-4.1.0-src.tgz /
21-Jan-2013) and it matches the online javadocs. So I guess you're preparing
for PyLucene v4.2?
Note: I think that
LUCENE_SVN=htt
