Thomas,
You're right--thanks for the correction. The script is now called
BiologicalUnit.
-- Jason
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Thomas Holder
wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> the result of "symexp" is not supposed to be the biological unit, right?
> It produces any symmetry mate, whereas your Manual
Hi Jason,
the result of "symexp" is not supposed to be the biological unit, right?
It produces any symmetry mate, whereas your ManualSymExp reads the
REMARK 350 which is the annotated biological unit. It is a very useful
script, but has a bug: If there is more then one biomolecule annotated,
for e
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 15:46 -0600, Nicolas Bock wrote:
>
> the script does not create symmetry mates. The "symexp"
> command can create symmetry mates within a given radius (it
> will not just fill up the cell).
>
> Maybe I just don't understand the symexp command,
