RE: [PyMOL] manual update

2006-04-04 Thread Warren DeLano
ginal Message- > From: pymol-users-ad...@lists.sourceforge.net > [mailto:pymol-users-ad...@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of > Dr. Mark Mayer > Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 6:23 AM > To: pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [PyMOL] manual update > > De

Re: [PyMOL] manual update

2006-04-04 Thread Peter Adrian Meyer
> this little thread points nicely to the major problem that I have > quite often with PyMol: it is a really powerful program, but the > documentation is somewhere scattered between various incomplete > sources (manual, reference list, wiki, bulletin board, user home > pages, ...). This makes it ve

Re: [PyMOL] manual update

2006-04-04 Thread Stephane Gagne
Dear Warren, I could not agree more with Mark and Dirk. I recently received my "PyMOL Subscription Renewal" email from DeLano Scientific, and I must admit I will not renew my subscription, and for only one reason; the documentation is not up-to-date! Especially since (according to the Manual

[PyMOL] manual update

2006-04-04 Thread Dr. Mark Mayer
Dear Warren, I would second Dirk's statement below. The manuals on web are a couple of years out of date now, and while the wiki and bulletin board are very useful sources of information, I too would prefer to have good up to date documentation, rather than more and more improvements with poo