IMO real zest and usefulness of multithreading are complex shared data
structures.
That said, most multithreaded programs share a very small, albeit
critical subset of their data.
What you propose is something akin to cpython multiprocessing or
stackless with the addition of parallel execution of
Saturday 09 April 2011 you wrote:
> Hi Jacob,
>
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Jacob Hallén wrote:
> > So, in a second step, we provide for special data types that can be
> > shared between threads. These would typically be allocated in
> > non-movable memory, to avoid the complexity of garba
Hi Jacob,
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Jacob Hallén wrote:
> So, in a second step, we provide for special data types that can be shared
> between threads. These would typically be allocated in non-movable memory, to
> avoid the complexity of garbage collection of memory with shared use. You c
I have been thinking about the multithreading problem in PyPy for a while and
I have come up with an idea. I'd like to have feedback from people who know
the codebase well.
The first and hardest step is to change the PyPy runtime so that it can run
multiple threads at the same time. To simplify
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Laura Creighton wrote:
> That's really too bad. Are you going to Europython?
Yes, I'm going to come for the conference and the PyPy sprint.
At least I will try to come ;-)
___
pypy-dev@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net
In a message of Sat, 09 Apr 2011 14:27:49 +0200, Bartosz SKOWRON writes:
>On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Laura Creighton wrote:
>
>> And I am getting a price of 39,99 Euros out (on the 23rd)
>> and 9,98 if you leave on the 3rd. =C2=A059,99 if you leave on the 2nd.
>>
>> So yes, much cheaper. =C2=
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Laura Creighton wrote:
> And I am getting a price of 39,99 Euros out (on the 23rd)
> and 9,98 if you leave on the 3rd. 59,99 if you leave on the 2nd.
>
> So yes, much cheaper. Thank you.
:) I'm glad I could help. Wish to come to the sprint either but can't
make
In a message of Sat, 09 Apr 2011 13:52:13 +0200, Laura Creighton writes:
re:
>>This is with a stop in London Stansted. However now I found a direct
>>connection from Dublin to Stockholm Skavsta for mailer didn't like-- laura > by RyanAir. It's
>>really cheap.
And I am getting a price of 39,99 Eur
In a message of Sat, 09 Apr 2011 13:19:32 +0200, Bartosz SKOWRON writes:
>On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Laura Creighton wrote:
>
>> What did you find? =C2=A0Because both of the Gothenburg airports claim
>to
>> have no connections to Ireland whatsoever.
>
>This is with a stop in London Stansted.
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Laura Creighton wrote:
> What did you find? Because both of the Gothenburg airports claim to
> have no connections to Ireland whatsoever.
This is with a stop in London Stansted. However now I found a direct
connection from Dublin to Stockholm Skavsta for 95€ by R
What did you find? Because both of the Gothenburg airports claim to
have no connections to Ireland whatsoever.
Laura, who would be very pleasantly surprised if this is wrong.
___
pypy-dev@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Romain Guillebert wrote:
> - 397.75€ for the plane between Dublin and Copenhagen (It's really
> expensive in my opinion but I can't find something cheaper)
> - 394 SEK * 2 for the train between Copenhagen and Gothenburg
Very quick research showed me a connection
12 matches
Mail list logo
