Re: [pypy-dev] [pypy-svn] r75220 - in pypy/trunk/pypy: annotation annotation/test jit/backend jit/backend/llgraph jit/backend/llgraph/test jit/backend/llsupport jit/backend/llsupport/test jit/backend/

On 13/06/10 08:46, Armin Rigo wrote: > I'm a bit confused, btw: I thought that ootype did not need ConstAddr at > all, because it used ConstObj for all pointer-ish things. ah sorry. You wrote ConstAddr but I actually read ConstPtr (i.e., ConstObj for ootype). Indeed, ConstAddr is not used at all

Re: [pypy-dev] [pypy-svn] r75220 - in pypy/trunk/pypy: annotation annotation/test jit/backend jit/backend/llgraph jit/backend/llgraph/test jit/backend/llsupport jit/backend/llsupport/test jit/backend/

Hi Anto, On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:26:07AM +0200, Antonio Cuni wrote: > I didn't look at the branch deeply, but the last sentence looks > suspiciously hard/impossible to implement in ootype. Could you explain why > ConstAdrr were bad please? Because the blackhole interpreter doesn't use Const

Re: [pypy-dev] [pypy-svn] r75220 - in pypy/trunk/pypy: annotation annotation/test jit/backend jit/backend/llgraph jit/backend/llgraph/test jit/backend/llsupport jit/backend/llsupport/test jit/backend/

On 08/06/10 23:42, ar...@codespeak.net wrote: > The number of changes is a bit huge though. The > format of the static bytecodes used by the jit > changed completely, and codewriter.py is now split > among many files in the new directory pypy.jit.codewriter. > There is also no longer ConstAddr, on