Re: [pypy-dev] Worrying set of checkins

2011-02-01 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc > wrote: >> 2011/2/1 Maciej Fijalkowski : >>> Anyone feeling like looking into this: >>> >>> http://speed.pypy.org/changes/?tre=10&rev=41510:77f94f44989a&exe=3&env=tannit >> >> This

Re: [pypy-dev] Worrying set of checkins

2011-02-01 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote: > 2011/2/1 Maciej Fijalkowski : >> Anyone feeling like looking into this: >> >> http://speed.pypy.org/changes/?tre=10&rev=41510:77f94f44989a&exe=3&env=tannit > > This show benchmarks for pypy *without* JIT. > the pypy-c-jit figures are m

Re: [pypy-dev] Worrying set of checkins

2011-02-01 Thread Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
2011/2/1 Maciej Fijalkowski : > Anyone feeling like looking into this: > > http://speed.pypy.org/changes/?tre=10&rev=41510:77f94f44989a&exe=3&env=tannit This show benchmarks for pypy *without* JIT. the pypy-c-jit figures are more positive. -- Amaury Forgeot d'Arc

[pypy-dev] Worrying set of checkins

2011-02-01 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
Anyone feeling like looking into this: http://speed.pypy.org/changes/?tre=10&rev=41510:77f94f44989a&exe=3&env=tannit ? ___ pypy-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev