On 7/15/2011 2:31 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
I know, this is kind of hand-waving what has to be done, I would
probably start with having two interpreters in one executable,
probably by having two object spaces.
Cheers,
fijal
And if I may ask, what are you trying to achieve?
Two (or more)
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 4:44 AM, Armin Rigo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Antonio Cuni
> wrote:
> > I think that armin investigated this, and the outcome was that it's
> because of
> > the changes we did in the GC during the sprint. Armin, do you confirm?
> > Do we have a so
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 9:05 PM, VanL wrote:
>> On 7/15/2011 1:50 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>>>
>>> By design, a single process thing is slightly less secure. If you say
>>> find a way to corrupt random memory, you can modify the ot
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 9:05 PM, VanL wrote:
> On 7/15/2011 1:50 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>>
>> By design, a single process thing is slightly less secure. If you say
>> find a way to corrupt random memory, you can modify the other process,
>> it's still only very slightly though. The sandboxi
On 7/15/2011 1:50 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
By design, a single process thing is slightly less secure. If you say
find a way to corrupt random memory, you can modify the other process,
it's still only very slightly though. The sandboxing approach should
work quite nicely, the hard part would
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 7:09 PM, VanL wrote:
> I have a couple questions about the sandboxing feature:
>
> - Currently this is a two-process model, but early on the assertion was made
> that this could be done in a single process, perhaps but not necessarily
> separated by two OS-level threads. Is
I have a couple questions about the sandboxing feature:
- Currently this is a two-process model, but early on the assertion was
made that this could be done in a single process, perhaps but not
necessarily separated by two OS-level threads. Is this (still?) true?
What would you need to invoke
Hi
Just to let you know that I will come except if the sprint occurs during
the week of the 31st of August (I have an oral exam that I already
postponed to attend to the Genova sprint).
Cheers
Romain
___
pypy-dev mailing list
pypy-dev@python.org
http://
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Antonio Cuni wrote:
> I think that armin investigated this, and the outcome was that it's because of
> the changes we did in the GC during the sprint. Armin, do you confirm?
> Do we have a solution?
I confirm, and still have no solution. I tried to devise a
On 12/07/11 01:20, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm a bit worried with our current benchmarks state. We have around 4
> benchmarks that had reasonable slowdowns recently
[cut]
Ok, let's try to make a summary of what we discovered about benchmark
regressions.
>
> Current list:
>
> http:/
Hi all,
I know that there is a vague plan to have a sprint in Düsseldorf in the last
week of august, on time with the end of Eurostars.
Can we make it more concrete, decided the dates, and announce it, please?
It's very likely that I'll go on vacation in the 3rd week of august, thus it
would be
11 matches
Mail list logo
