Re: [pypy-dev] speed and 1.6

Done, I tagged revision 46161:eb30a0ef328e (1st of August) as PyPy 1.6. Can be seen now on the start page. Cheers, Miquel 2011/9/8 Antonio Cuni : > On 08/09/11 12:15, Miquel Torres wrote: >> >> which sadly doesn't have data on speed.pypy.org (not all data saved on >> the removed environment was

Re: [pypy-dev] PyCON UK Sept 24 + 25

Hi Laura, On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Laura Creighton wrote: > John Pinner wants to know if any of us are coming and will there be a PyPy > sprint. I am not --- England is no longer on my yearly road nowadays... Also, maybe it's worth being recalled: the "classical PyPy sprint" format we al

[pypy-dev] PyCON UK Sept 24 + 25

John Pinner wants to know if any of us are coming and will there be a PyPy sprint. Laura ___ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev

Re: [pypy-dev] Errors running pypy with ctype library

Humm interesting, I wonder why it works in Cpython, when I get the chance I will try making those changes and see if pypy works. On 06/09/11 23:57, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote: 2011/9/7 Greg Bowyer > Hi all, I have a rather interesting in house networking tool

Re: [pypy-dev] deepcopy slower in PyPy - testing script

Hi to all That was an interesting result, so (for what I understood) there is nothing wrong with PyPy, it's just the code I'm trying to run doesn't have "sufficient" loops for the JIT to kickstart and be useful ? Any one has a copy of "PyPy for dummies" ^_^ All the best Jorge On 08/09/11 14:2

Re: [pypy-dev] deepcopy slower in PyPy - testing script

On Thursday, September 8, 2011 at 12:58:54 PM, Jorge de Jesus wrote: > Hi to all > > Thank you for all the answers concerning the topic. > > The deepcopy testing script in issue 767 [1], is working faster in PyPy > than in CPython, but deepcopy is run on a list of numbers. > > BUT, PyWPS runs

Re: [pypy-dev] [Speed] Moving the project forward

PING: Did we make progress? On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Miquel Torres wrote: > You can also do that in Github, which I prefer. > > However, since CPython and PyPy use mercurial, the general preference > for Bitbucket is understandable. > > > 2011/9/1 Brett Cannon : >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 0

[pypy-dev] deepcopy slower in PyPy - testing script

Hi to all Thank you for all the answers concerning the topic. The deepcopy testing script in issue 767 [1], is working faster in PyPy than in CPython, but deepcopy is run on a list of numbers. BUT, PyWPS runs a lot of DOM functions and deepcopy calls that pass DOM Elements as argument. Just to

Re: [pypy-dev] speed and 1.6

On 08/09/11 12:15, Miquel Torres wrote: which sadly doesn't have data on speed.pypy.org (not all data saved on the removed environment was kept, sorry). The August 1st revision is probably not acceptable to portrait as being 1.6 ... looking at the graphs, I don't see any big difference between

Re: [pypy-dev] speed and 1.6

which sadly doesn't have data on speed.pypy.org (not all data saved on the removed environment was kept, sorry). The August 1st revision is probably not acceptable to portrait as being 1.6 ... 2011/9/8 Antonio Cuni : > On 08/09/11 10:46, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > >>> What about starting the ben

Re: [pypy-dev] speed and 1.6

On 08/09/11 10:46, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: What about starting the benchmarks manually on the branch release-1.6.x? Miquel, would it be possible to tag those results as "PyPy 1.6" when we have them? We can mark trunk from the day we made the release branch (that's what we did so far). whic

Re: [pypy-dev] speed and 1.6

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Antonio Cuni wrote: > On 03/09/11 08:51, Miquel Torres wrote: >> >> Which revision is (or "simulates") 1.6? > > I don't think there is the exact revision on codespeed, because the release > was made on a branch (release-1.6.x, I think), not on trunk. > > What about

Re: [pypy-dev] speed and 1.6

On 03/09/11 08:51, Miquel Torres wrote: Which revision is (or "simulates") 1.6? I don't think there is the exact revision on codespeed, because the release was made on a branch (release-1.6.x, I think), not on trunk. What about starting the benchmarks manually on the branch release-1.6.x? M

Re: [pypy-dev] deepcopy slower in PyPY ?!

On Wednesday, September 7, 2011 at 10:38:10 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Antonio Cuni > wrote: > > Hi Jorge, > > > > On 07/09/11 16:43, Jorge de Jesus wrote: > >> > >>  Hi to all > >> > >> I've benchmark/profile  some code (PyWPS API) and PyPy-c is 2/3x > >> ti