Hi,
I think I improved the time quite a lot in revision c98931f5191b.
The memory usage is known to be larger on PyPy for this kind of
operations. For a more general program with a lot of instances it can
be equivalent or slightly better than CPython.
A bientôt,
Armin.
If there are people like me who can't read Chinese,
an automatic translation suggests that with any version of pypy (on
Windows),
readlines() is very slow and consumes a lot of CPU;
the sample file was 20M.
2011/11/4 ZZZ 654321
> 经过测试, 我发现在 windows 下, pypy 的任意版本, 执行下面操作, 会占用很高的 CPU, 并且速度很慢, 测试样
Thanks Davide. It's fixed now.
Cheers
Miquel
2011/11/4 Davide Setti :
> Hi,
>
> If i click on the permalink link on
>
> http://speed.pypy.org/timeline/#/?exe=3,6,1,5&base=2+472&ben=grid&env=1&revs=200&equid=off
>
> i get:
>
> http://speed.pypy.org/timeline/?exe=3%2C6%2C1%2C5&base=2%2B472&ben=gri
Hi,
If i click on the permalink link on
http://speed.pypy.org/timeline/#/?exe=3,6,1,5&base=2+472&ben=grid&env=1&revs=200&equid=off
i get:
http://speed.pypy.org/timeline/?exe=3%2C6%2C1%2C5&base=2%2B472&ben=grid&env=1&revs=200&equid=off
DEBUG=True is not good...
Regards.
--
Davide Setti
code:
