On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Stefan Behnel, 01.04.2012 15:04:
>> Armin Rigo, 01.04.2012 12:31:
>>> Hi Stefan,
>>>
>>> Done in 623bcea85df3.
>>
>> Thanks, Armin!
>>
>> Would have taken me a while to figure these things out.
>>
>> I'll give it a try with the next nightly.
>
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Maciej Fijalkowski, 01.04.2012 15:42:
>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Armin Rigo, 01.04.2012 12:31:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Done in 623bcea85df3.
>
Stefan Behnel, 01.04.2012 15:04:
> Armin Rigo, 01.04.2012 12:31:
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> Done in 623bcea85df3.
>
> Thanks, Armin!
>
> Would have taken me a while to figure these things out.
>
> I'll give it a try with the next nightly.
Hmm, looks broken:
http://buildbot.pypy.org/builders/pypy-c-ji
Maciej Fijalkowski, 01.04.2012 15:42:
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> Armin Rigo, 01.04.2012 12:31:
Hi Stefan,
Done in 623bcea85df3.
>>>
>>> Thanks, Armin!
>>>
>>> Would have taken me a while to f
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Armin Rigo, 01.04.2012 12:31:
>>> Hi Stefan,
>>>
>>> Done in 623bcea85df3.
>>
>> Thanks, Armin!
>>
>> Would have taken me a while to figure these things out.
>>
>> I'll give it a tr
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Armin Rigo, 01.04.2012 12:31:
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> Done in 623bcea85df3.
>
> Thanks, Armin!
>
> Would have taken me a while to figure these things out.
>
> I'll give it a try with the next nightly.
>
> Stefan
>
> ___
Armin Rigo, 01.04.2012 12:31:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Done in 623bcea85df3.
Thanks, Armin!
Would have taken me a while to figure these things out.
I'll give it a try with the next nightly.
Stefan
___
pypy-dev mailing list
pypy-dev@python.org
http://mail.py
Hi Laura,
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 14:02, Laura Creighton wrote:
> Good idea. Is this a 'scientific paper for a conference' sort of thing,
> or a 'post it on the internet' sort of thing?
I had in mind a workshop/conference/journal, but of course it would
also be available on the net.
A bientôt,
In a message of Sun, 01 Apr 2012 11:23:40 +0200, Armin Rigo writes:
>I'm also thinking about writing a short paper collecting things I said
>and think on various blog posts. A kind of "position paper". What do
>others think of this idea?
Good idea. Is this a 'scientific paper for a conference'
> Hi Roberto,
>
> On 27.03.2012, Roberto De Ioris wrote:
>> Hi everyone, i have finally managed to have a pypy plugin into uWSGI via
>> libpypy-c.
>
> Great!
>
> Are you still working on it? We can accept patches; for us it would
> also be cool if you can work on a clone of the repository and is
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Armin Rigo wrote:
> Hi Andrew, hi all,
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 18:23, Andrew Francis wrote:
>>>Indeed, and it was around 2007, so I expect the authors to have been
>>>involved in completely different things for quite some time now...
>>>But I could try to cont
Hi Stefan,
Done in 623bcea85df3.
Armin
___
pypy-dev mailing list
pypy-dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
Hi Roberto,
On 27.03.2012, Roberto De Ioris wrote:
> Hi everyone, i have finally managed to have a pypy plugin into uWSGI via
> libpypy-c.
Great!
Are you still working on it? We can accept patches; for us it would
also be cool if you can work on a clone of the repository and issue
"pull reques
Hi Fijal,
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 15:30, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> This sounds overly specific to me. What do others think?
It is indeed overly specific, but it may be useful nevertheless. We
need to rephrase it to point out the specific-vs-general parts.
Something like this:
Q: How can I t
Hi Timothy,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 16:35, Timothy Baldridge wrote:
> What should I look into for benchmarking actual times spent
> in each loop?
As a first approximation, getting only the execution counts is enough.
Basically the work flow is: pick one of the most often executed
loops, look in
Hi Andrew, hi all,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 18:23, Andrew Francis wrote:
>>Indeed, and it was around 2007, so I expect the authors to have been
>>involved in completely different things for quite some time now...
>>But I could try to contact them anyway.
>
> Communications is good :-)
I'm also th
16 matches
Mail list logo