Leo Trottier, 11.04.2012 20:56:
> Actually, my motivation was not to get Calibre to be faster -- I use it
> only occasionally. All I knew was that Calibre was an application (1) built
> on Python, that (2) the Python interpreter it used was baked-in to the
> distribution, and (3) it seemed to perfo
2012/4/11 Hong Minhee :
> I reported https://bugs.pypy.org/issue1126 which shows that __exit__
> is not called in certain cases when I think it should be. The code to
> reproduce the bug is there. The code works on CPython.
>
> It was closed as invalid saying this is a GC issue, but I don't think
I reported https://bugs.pypy.org/issue1126 which shows that __exit__
is not called in certain cases when I think it should be. The code to
reproduce the bug is there. The code works on CPython.
It was closed as invalid saying this is a GC issue, but I don't think
it is. This is about __exit__, n
Actually, my motivation was not to get Calibre to be faster -- I use it
only occasionally. All I knew was that Calibre was an application (1) built
on Python, that (2) the Python interpreter it used was baked-in to the
distribution, and (3) it seemed to perform a number of operations somewhat
slowl
Thank you! Finally I've built libpupy.so and uwsgi with it.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:22, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2012/4/11 Max Lavrenov
>
>> Hello everyone!
>>
>> I got some errors while i was building the embedded-pypy branch with
>> python translate.py -Ojit --shared.
>> Coul
Hi Matti,
On 04/11/2012 01:24 PM, mattip wrote:
Author: Matti Picus
Branch: win32-stdlib
Changeset: r54283:2a8e4f56269f
Date: 2012-04-11 13:26 +0300
http://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/changeset/2a8e4f56269f/
Log:fix close() and tests for file closing
diff --git a/lib-python/2.7/mailbox.py b/li
Hi Andrew,
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 01:25, Andrew Francis wrote:
> Question: without specific transaction_start() and transaction_commit()
> calls, how does rstm know what the start and finish of transactions are?
Please take a different point of view: if the proper adaptation is
done, the users o
Hi all,
Countrary to what is written in the STM/AME proposal, since last week I
believe it might be (reasonably) possible to apply the same techniques
to CPython. For now I am experimenting with applying them in a simple
CPython-like interpreter. If it works, it might end up as a patch to
the co
On 04/11/2012 11:08 AM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote:
2012/4/11 Ronny Pfannschmidt
hi,
since its kind of troublesome to deal with stdlib vs modified-stdlib,
i'd like to propose an new model for tracking our changes to the stdlib
the unmodified stdlib would be in a branch, say vendor/stdlib,
wh
2012/4/11 Ronny Pfannschmidt
> hi,
>
> since its kind of troublesome to deal with stdlib vs modified-stdlib,
>
> i'd like to propose an new model for tracking our changes to the stdlib
>
> the unmodified stdlib would be in a branch, say vendor/stdlib,
> while our modifications will get inlined in
hi,
since its kind of troublesome to deal with stdlib vs modified-stdlib,
i'd like to propose an new model for tracking our changes to the stdlib
the unmodified stdlib would be in a branch, say vendor/stdlib,
while our modifications will get inlined in the default branch
that way we get easier
Leo Trottier, 11.04.2012 02:23:
> A number of Python applications (e.g. http://calibre-ebook.com/,
> http://www.psychopy.org/ ...
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Python_software#Applications) are
> deployed together with the libraries and interpreter that they will use.
>
> Often, these app
Hi,
2012/4/11 Max Lavrenov
> Hello everyone!
>
> I got some errors while i was building the embedded-pypy branch with
> python translate.py -Ojit --shared.
> Could anybody help me with it, please?
>
trackgcroot.py does not recognize some constructs used when compiling with
-fPIC.
I thought I f
13 matches
Mail list logo
