On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> I have a slight preference for the PSF servers if it's possible, I'll get in
> touch with Noah and see what I can do to help move this along.
>
> Alex
I have serious preference for servers where people having physical
access can respond in a t
I have a slight preference for the PSF servers if it's possible, I'll get
in touch with Noah and see what I can do to help move this along.
Alex
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Antonio Cuni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/06/2012 05:43 PM, Armin Rigo wrote:
>
> > Right now, we have extra servers sittin
Hi,
On 12/06/2012 05:43 PM, Armin Rigo wrote:
> Right now, we have extra servers sitting around not doing much. I'm
> for moving all three services there. Fijal and me have access, and
> I'm sure anyone else that needs it would have access too.
which servers?
_
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> So let's wait for a group decision.
Right now, we have extra servers sitting around not doing much. I'm
for moving all three services there. Fijal and me have access, and
I'm sure anyone else that needs it would have access too.
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 8:26 AM, holger krekel wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 07:57 -0800, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:23 AM, holger krekel wrote:
>> > Hi folks,
>> >
>> > for the last several years i cared for hosting these pypy services:
>> >
>> > - pypy.org (static g
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 07:57 -0800, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:23 AM, holger krekel wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > for the last several years i cared for hosting these pypy services:
> >
> > - pypy.org (static generated html)
> > - bugs.pypy.org (roundup instance, postfix
What kind of traffic are you seeing? perhaps we could offer some free
hosting... Currently Python/WSGI only, but we should have support for static
sites coming soon.
--
Harry Percival
Developer
ha...@pythonanywhere.com
PythonAnywhere - a fully browser-based Python development and hosting
en
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:23 AM, holger krekel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> for the last several years i cared for hosting these pypy services:
>
> - pypy.org (static generated html)
> - bugs.pypy.org (roundup instance, postfix server)
> - speed.python.org (django app)
>
> These services are living on tw
Hi folks,
for the last several years i cared for hosting these pypy services:
- pypy.org (static generated html)
- bugs.pypy.org (roundup instance, postfix server)
- speed.python.org (django app)
These services are living on two rented servers which cost me per-month
and i am finally getting rid
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> The problem, *right now* is that it's a proof of concept that requires
> some work to be finished and/or to use JIT and be fast. I won't do it,
> also because I have other Open Source commitments at hand.
Same here. Anyone is welco
2012/12/6 Leonardo Santagada :
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>> * xml literals are unsupported
>
>
> They are only supported in firefox and flash so I don't think too many
> people use it, but then if needed you can try
> https://github.com/laverdet/js-xml-literal
Al
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> * the correct semicolon insertion requires a different parser
> (standard says LL(1))
>
The apple javascript parser (and maybe V8) don't use a LL(1) parser and
still cope with ASI so maybe there are alternatives to this... but yep, for
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:52 AM, holger krekel wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 02:14 -0800, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Jonathan Slenders
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Yesterday, I did some experiments with the existing javascript interpreter
>> > that was wri
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 02:14 -0800, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Jonathan Slenders
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Yesterday, I did some experiments with the existing javascript interpreter
> > that was written in RPython. [1]
> > It worked very well when interpreted
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Jonathan Slenders wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Yesterday, I did some experiments with the existing javascript interpreter
> that was written in RPython. [1]
> It worked very well when interpreted by CPython, but failed to translate to
> C because of unsigned int issues.
>
>
Hi all,
Yesterday, I did some experiments with the existing javascript interpreter
that was written in RPython. [1]
It worked very well when interpreted by CPython, but failed to translate to
C because of unsigned int issues.
Quite a few times, unsigned and signed objects were compared or added,
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Joe Hillenbrand wrote:
> I've found a place where PyPy and CPython disagree.
>
> https://gist.github.com/4220533
>
> This might not be the only issue, but it's the first thing I've found so
> far.
>
> -Joe
This is a well known issue - PyPy's methods and builtin met
17 matches
Mail list logo
