2013/4/9 Peter Cock
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Matti Picus wrote:
> > Note that patch is incomplete, it is missing an "import os" (thanks bdk)
> > that was added in a later changeset.
> > Matti
>
> I'd probably have managed but thanks - one less surprise
> for me tomorrow :)
>
> I was won
Héllo,
I'm working on porting a redis clone to pypy-stm [1].
I did some benchmark, the interesting code is [2]. it runs 5 thread both on
sides client/server, it might be much, what do you think ? I have 4 cores.
(memo-stm)amirouche@funfev13 ~/src/Memo/client (pypy-stm*) $ time python
test_client
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Matti Picus wrote:
> Note that patch is incomplete, it is missing an "import os" (thanks bdk)
> that was added in a later changeset.
> Matti
I'd probably have managed but thanks - one less surprise
for me tomorrow :)
I was wondering if this was a symptom of a larg
Note that patch is incomplete, it is missing an "import os" (thanks bdk)
that was added in a later changeset.
Matti
On 9/04/2013 10:03 PM, Peter Cock wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Philip Jenvey wrote:
This was fixed yesterday, see: https://bugs.pypy.org/issue1440
Thanks! The bug rep
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Philip Jenvey wrote:
> This was fixed yesterday, see: https://bugs.pypy.org/issue1440
>
Thanks! The bug report doesn't auto-link to the repository,
so for anyone else the changeset is here and looks easy
enough to apply manually to try it on Windows without
having
This was fixed yesterday, see: https://bugs.pypy.org/issue1440
On Apr 9, 2013 9:45 AM, "Peter Cock" wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've downloaded and unzipped pypy-2.0-beta2-win32.zip but
> fairly early on in my testing ran into this puzzle:
>
> C:\>c:\pypy-2.0\pypy.exe
> Python 2.7.3 (3eef596df459, Ap
Hello all,
I've downloaded and unzipped pypy-2.0-beta2-win32.zip but
fairly early on in my testing ran into this puzzle:
C:\>c:\pypy-2.0\pypy.exe
Python 2.7.3 (3eef596df459, Apr 06 2013, 12:40:10)
[PyPy 2.0.0-beta2 with MSC v.1500 32 bit] on win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license"
And one more question about packaging.
[e-max@e-max release]$ ~/workspace/pypy_59920/bin/pypy package.py ../../..
pypy-63131
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "app_main.py", line 52, in run_toplevel
File "app_main.py", line 541, in run_it
File "", line 1, in
File "/home/e-max/worksp
It works. Thanks Armin!
Best regards,
Max
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Armin Rigo wrote:
> Hi Max,
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Max Lavrenov
> wrote:
> > [platform:Error] "inconsistent frame size at instruction %s" %
> (insn,))
>
> We have seen this error reported already (it
Hi Max,
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Max Lavrenov wrote:
> [platform:Error] "inconsistent frame size at instruction %s" % (insn,))
We have seen this error reported already (it occurred with gcc 4.8,
but that may not be strictly related). Assuming it's the same, I
fixed it in trunk. Can
Hello
I've tried to build pypy from repository but got some compilation error.
There is a very big traceback, so i skip some parts.
Maybe i could provide some additional information? I still have opened pdb
console with this failed compilation.
Thanks.
[platform:execute] make -j 3 in /tmp/use
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Roger Flores wrote:
> Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>>It's just a bunch of work. There is nothing special or magic about it, but
>> so far noone volunteered to spend enough effort there.
>
> Got it. I'm just trying to understand what the work is because that list
> hasn
Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>It's just a bunch of work. There is nothing special or magic about it,but so
>far noone volunteered to spend enough effort there.
Got it. I'm just trying to understand what the work is because that list hasn't
been captured anywhere yet.
>Essentially, the main probl
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Roger Flores wrote:
> Amaury wrote:
>>Surely we could have another copy with the largeadressaware flag?
>
> I agree. That's a smart way to proceed for now.
>
>
> I'm still wondering if there is any technical reason against the flag?
> Particularly the "CFFI extens
14 matches
Mail list logo
