Re: [pypy-dev] [pypy-commit] pypy default: Add an alternative method to detect main cpu model and size using different

2013-04-23 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
Maybe it's worth noting that IA64 (intel itanium) is an entirely different architecture than x86_64 and we do not support it. Please remove chekcing for this code. Cheers, fijal On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:08 PM, bivab wrote: > Author: David Schneider > Branch: > Changeset: r63566:1891968c05e4 >

[pypy-dev] numpypy buffer interface for slices different from numpy

2013-04-23 Thread Kay F. Jahnke
Hi group! I stumbled upon a difference in numpypy's ndarray buffer interface. If I take the address of the data of a slice in numpy, I get a pointer to the first element in the slice. In numpypy I get a pointer to the data I took the slice from. I wonder if this is a bug or deliberate? If it's

[pypy-dev] about PyPy's sandbox

2013-04-23 Thread zcx
Hi All, I have study PyPy's sandbox for some time.But as my limited ability,I can't understand the detail about the PyPy's sandbox. And I want to discuss something with you: 1.Cuted Modules What are the reasons to cut some standard modules? (I mean the modules which in 'working_modules' but not

[pypy-dev] about PyPy sandbox

2013-04-23 Thread ????
Hi All, I have study PyPy's sandbox for some time.But as my limited ability,I can't understand the detail about the PyPy's sandbox. And I want to discuss something with you: 1.Cuted Modules What are the reasons to cut some standard modules? (I mean the modules which in 'working_modules' but no

Re: [pypy-dev] getting cppyy enabled by default in the next release?

2013-04-23 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:39 PM, wrote: > Hi, > > what are my chances of getting cppyy enabled by default in the next (beta) > release of pypy? > > The code has been cleaned so that no external libraries are needed when > builing pypy-c, and none will be needed at run-time until "import cppyy". >

Re: [pypy-dev] Fwd: Re: ARM v6 GSOC

2013-04-23 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:36 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 3:10 AM, william > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:41 PM, william >> wrote: >> >> > What would be a good way to propose either of these as a project? >> >> If you want to discuss it, we can move the conversat