Hi,
On 1 September 2014 17:06, Phyo Arkar wrote:
> Thanks a lot. I haven't get to test lastest commit yet.
> So in that , attached benchmark in pypy is running faster than python now?
Yes, for the utf-8 test (the tests with "double" didn't change). Here
is what I get on Linux 64:
$ pypy-c-r732
Thanks a lot. I haven't get to test lastest commit yet.
So in that , attached benchmark in pypy is running faster than python now?
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Armin Rigo wrote:
> Re-hi,
>
> On 1 September 2014 12:20, Armin Rigo wrote:
>> Tweaked!
>
> Note that the final result is 33% faster
Wow, nice catch!
Alex
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Armin Rigo wrote:
> Re-hi,
>
> On 1 September 2014 12:20, Armin Rigo wrote:
> > Tweaked!
>
> Note that the final result is 33% faster in your example.
>
>
> Armin
>
--
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your
Re-hi,
On 1 September 2014 12:20, Armin Rigo wrote:
> Tweaked!
Note that the final result is 33% faster in your example.
Armin
___
pypy-dev mailing list
pypy-dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
Hi Alex,
On 30 August 2014 08:43, Armin Rigo wrote:
> went down from 5.8ms per loop to 208us. However, I see that running
> the same example with 1 ascii chars went up from 41.4us to 139us.
> Time to tweak.
Tweaked! See 65ac482d28d6. This was because if you used this kind of
code in RPyth
