Armin: the luajit GC does not exist either, it's just a plan as far as I know
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Armin Rigo wrote:
> Hi Remi,
>
> Just thinking about stmgc: currently it requires large transactions in
> order to work efficiently. I think it is mostly caused by the fact
> that trans
Hi Armin,
I think we need to quantify how bad the minor GCs really are. They are
thread-local and they should also take less time for shorter
transactions.
The last benchmark I looked at had a different problem that I would
summarize as (1) time spent creating backup copies, (2) huge commit
log e