On looking further the functionality is there for shadow objects.
On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 12:03 PM Joannah Nanjekye
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I read about the hash field optimization here:
> https://www.pypy.org/posts/2009/10/gc-improvements-6174120095428192954.html
>
> But when I query object.__hash_
Hi Matti,
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 at 09:21, Matti Picus wrote:
> Now that 7.3.14 has been released, I would like to move the canonical
> repo for pypy and rpython to github. Reasons:
+1 from me from the reasons you describe!
A bientôt,
Armin
___
pypy-de
Hello.
I read about the hash field optimization here:
https://www.pypy.org/posts/2009/10/gc-improvements-6174120095428192954.html
But when I query object.__hash__(4) on the latest pypy branch, it returns,
I expected a type error.
I stand to be corrected obviously.
--
Best,
Joannah Nanjekye
*"Y
Welcome news, if only because of my terrible mercurial skills 😅
I tried with only partial success to get the unit tests working on github
runners some time ago (see
https://github.com/olliemath/pypy/actions/runs/3851138348 )
Hopefully some of the required work might be useful in the future:
https:
I think that this is a good suggestion and a good plan.
David
On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 3:21 AM Matti Picus wrote:
> Now that 7.3.14 has been released, I would like to move the canonical
> repo for pypy and rpython to github. Reasons:
>
> - foss.heptapod.net is not well tracked in google/bing/du
Now that 7.3.14 has been released, I would like to move the canonical
repo for pypy and rpython to github. Reasons:
- foss.heptapod.net is not well tracked in google/bing/duckduckgo
search, so people find it hard to search for issues in the project
- since the site has tightened its spam cont
