on
CPython. However, I measured time spent inside method and its 0.01s, and
actual sending of response takes 30s. This is very strange for reason.
How I can help on this and send you more details?
Regards,
Marko Tasic
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Ron Reiter wrote:
> Something rea
rformance boost, just correctness of approach.
Perhaps, I'm wrong.
What do you think, is this practical approach?
Regards,
Marko Tasic
___
pypy-dev mailing list
pypy-dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
r about it, and that is the perfect solution for "per machine"
concurrent programming. As far as I have freedom to pick technologies,
I will definitely relay on it on one of the next projects. What is the
status of it ATM, and what is best way to test and deploy pypy with
stm?
Regards,
Mar
eedup us is that we are dependent on external software (servers)
written in Erlang and Java.
I'm already planing to do Cassandra (distributed key/value only
database without index features), ZooKeeper, Redis and ElasticSearch
ports in Python for next projects, and hopefully opensource them.
R
scuss such stuff on IRC than via mail.
I'll find some time soon to discuss this with you guys.
Cheers,Marko Tasic
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Marko Tasic wrote:
>> Maciej,
>>
>> Thank you for an express re
erest is testing correctness and not speed. Later
on, I will try
to optimize interaction between GC and JIT if possible.
Cheers,
Marko Tasic
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Marko Tasic wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
>
f, just want to measure performance and possibly
implement alternative reference counting strategies.
Cheers,
Marko Tasic
___
pypy-dev mailing list
pypy-dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
