Sorry for this not very useful email, but I'd like to share a good piece of
news regarding PyPy.
I got a new PC at work, with modern hardware. I was surprised to see that a
PyPy build just took less than 8 minutes (using pypy2 of course), which is much
better than what I experienced before!
I
- Mail original -
> De: "Carl Friedrich Bolz-Tereick"
> À: "PIERRE AUGIER" , "PyPy Developer
> Mailing List"
> Envoyé: Jeudi 5 Juin 2025 09:53:42
> Objet: Re: [hpy-dev] Re: [pypy-dev] Re: [Numpy-discussion] Better
> compatibility of the Python scientific/data stack with
> fast Python i
- Mail original -
> De: "matti picus via hpy-dev"
> À: "PyPy Developer Mailing List" , "Ralf Gommers"
> , "hpy-dev"
>
> Envoyé: Vendredi 2 Mai 2025 10:05:51
> Objet: [hpy-dev] Re: [pypy-dev] Re: [Numpy-discussion] Better compatibility
> of the Python scientific/data stack with
> fast
- Mail original -
> De: "Stefan Krah"
> À: "numpy-discussion"
> Envoyé: Mercredi 7 Mai 2025 18:17:38
> Objet: [Numpy-discussion] Re: Better compatibility of the Python
> scientific/data stack with fast Python interpreters
> On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 03:52:33PM +0200, PIERRE AUGIER via Nu
Hi,
I try to write a text about what I understood on problems related to the
CPython C API, CPython performance, the scientific Python ecosystem and HPy
(see
https://discuss.python.org/t/c-api-working-group-and-plan-to-get-a-python-c-api-compatible-with-alternative-python-implementations/89477
Thanks Matti for this interesting and sad piece of news.
I also reply on numpy-discuss...@python.org since your message was not post on
this list and take the opportunity to signal another important post about his
subject on discuss.python.org by Stepan Sindelar:
https://discuss.python.org/t/c-
