Re: [pypy-dev] A proposal about Numpypy missing functions

2012-06-17 Thread Timo Paulssen
On 16.06.2012 16:03, Daπid wrote: Another example is the random module, easy to port using list comprehension and the random module from the standard library. In any case, based on the benchmarks I have seen, I think the pypy version would be even faster than the pure CPython+Numpy. Would y

[pypy-dev] custom classes in applevel tests

2012-04-28 Thread Timo Paulssen
Hello there, I was writing a few test cases for numpypy to make sure it behaves like numpy does when confronted with objects that have either an __int__, an __index__ or both (rule of thumb: index is prefered, but int is accepted in absence of index). Now, I wrote six tests that use three cus

[pypy-dev] custom classes in applevel tests

2012-04-28 Thread Timo Paulssen
Hello there, I was writing a few test cases for numpypy to make sure it behaves like numpy does when confronted with objects that have either an __int__, an __index__ or both (rule of thumb: index is prefered, but int is accepted in absence of index). Now, I wrote six tests that use three cus

[pypy-dev] towards more parallelization in the tracer/optimizer

2012-03-15 Thread Timo Paulssen
Hello, I just watched Benjamin Petersons talk on the JIT and one comment that seemed like just a sidethought caught my attention: "we are limited by speed. we don't want to spend three seconds optimizing it as fast as gcc possibly could, because noone wants the program to stop for three seco

Re: [pypy-dev] GC error

2012-01-16 Thread Timo Paulssen
Hello, PyPy has a hard limit on its heap size. It can be specified with this environment variable: PYPY_GC_MAXThe max heap size. If coming near this limit, it will first collect more often, then raise an RPython MemoryError, and if

Re: [pypy-dev] PyPy 1.7 coming

2011-10-08 Thread Timo Paulssen
On 08.10.2011 23:06, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > Hi > > I would like to start thinking about PyPy 1.7 and I volunteer for > being a release manager. It seems modulo few failing tests we're > generally in a good shape. Things I would like to get into. > > * my json improvements branch > * justin's

Re: [pypy-dev] Efficiently piecing together callables with hooks?

2011-08-15 Thread Timo Paulssen
set) for offset in self.offsets]))) where names would be list("lmr") and offsets would be (-1, 0, 1). self.code.acc is the class that handles how access to the array is supposed to work. I think I am going to kick out the lambda expressions that are supposed to retur

[pypy-dev] Efficiently piecing together callables with hooks?

2011-08-14 Thread Timo Paulssen
uld be way to go in this case? Or could pypy offer decorators or other hints to cause pypy to unroll and constant-fold different things for me? Thank you - Timo Paulssen ___ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev