We found the problem on the issue that Matti made. It's the float call
itself that has gotten slower. It's been fixed and we improved the PyPy2
performance in the process. Tomorrow's nightly should have the change.
Cheers,
CF
On 17.02.22 20:55, Yannis Foufoulas wrote:
Nothing changes,
the orig
Nothing changes,
the original implementation was
int(float(x)) if x else 0
However, I so that the overhead was the same if not using int.
Λήψη του BlueMail για Android
Στις 16 Φεβ 2022, 06:24 ,και ώρα 06:24 ,Dan Stromberg
έγραψε:
>I doubt this is an expected result for Pypy3.
>
>But what if
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 3:36 AM Ioannis Foufoulas
wrote:
Hi,
I have an embedded function:
@ffi.def_extern()
def toint(input,insize,result):
for i in range(insize):
x = ffi.string(input[i])
result[i] = float(x) if x else 0
return 1
It
I doubt this is an expected result for Pypy3.
But what if you use:
result[i] = float(x) if x else 0.0
...to make result be of homogeneous type?
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 3:36 AM Ioannis Foufoulas
wrote:
> Hi,
> I have an embedded function:
>
> @ffi.def_extern()
> def toint(input,insize,result):
Hi,
I have an embedded function:
@ffi.def_extern()
def toint(input,insize,result):
for i in range(insize):
x = ffi.string(input[i])
result[i] = float(x) if x else 0
return 1
It seems that this runs around 30-40% percent slower in PyPy3 than in 2.
Input is a char** c ar