Fijal,
Whether someone works full time on a project is a separate issue.
Being popular helps attract additional resources and PyPy is a project that
could use additional resources. How many additional optimizations could
PyPy add to get to a similar level of optimization to say the JVM. We are
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:41 AM, John Camara wrote:
> Fijal,
>
> In the past you have complained about it being hard to make money in open
> source. One way to make it easier for you is grow the popularity of PyPy.
> So I would think you would at least have some interest in thinking of ways
> to ac
Fijal,
In the past you have complained about it being hard to make money in open
source. One way to make it easier for you is grow the popularity of PyPy.
So I would think you would at least have some interest in thinking of ways
to accomplish that.
I'm not trying to dictate what PyPy should do
Hi John,
Thanks for your lengthy analysis. I'm sure that it can be interesting
for some to read. Unfortunately, I'm personally an Open Source
hobbyist that happens to come from a university background and I'm
still attached to some ideas behind it.
You say about my hacking STM: "Often the first
2013/2/6 Maciej Fijalkowski
> however, trying to convince volunteers that they should do what you
> think they should do is not really one of the helpful things you can
> be doing.
>
Except if this brings *new* volunteers to the project :-)
--
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
_
Hi John.
Let me summarize your long post how I understood it. "You guys should
bet everything on platform that both does not need PyPy and
expressed no real interest. The reason why is because PyPy is not
growing fast enough and we need a niche market. On top of that we
should answer a lot of una
Hi Armin,
It's even worse I'm asking you to support and I don't even need it.
When I posted this thread it was getting rather long and unfortunately I
didn't really make all the points I wanted to make. At this point, and
even for some time now PyPy has a great foundation but it's use remains
l
Hi John,
Sorry if I misread you, but you seem to be only saying "it would be
nice if the PyPy team worked on the support for rather than ".
While this might be true under some point of view, it is not
constructive. What would be nice is if *you* seriously proposed to
work on , or helped us raise
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:01 AM, John Camara wrote:
> A couple of days ago I heard about the Parallella [1] project which is an
> open hardware platform similar to the Raspberry Pi but with much higher
> capabilities. It has a Zynq Z-7010 which has both a dual core ARM A9 (800
> MHz) processor an
A couple of days ago I heard about the Parallella [1] project which is an
open hardware platform similar to the Raspberry Pi but with much higher
capabilities. It has a Zynq Z-7010 which has both a dual core ARM A9 (800
MHz) processor and a Artix-7 FPGA, a 16 core Epiphany multicore
accelerator, 1
10 matches
Mail list logo
