David Cournapeau, 08.08.2012 23:59:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Matti Picus wrote:
>> Someone tried getting f2py working on pypy a while ago, a quick search
>> turned up
>> http://www.dalkescientific.com/writings/diary/archive/2011/11/09/f2pypy.html
>> and a fork of code at
>> https://bitbuck
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Matti Picus wrote:
> Someone tried getting f2py working on pypy a while ago, a quick search
> turned up
> http://www.dalkescientific.com/writings/diary/archive/2011/11/09/f2pypy.html
> and a fork of code at
> https://bitbucket.org/pypy/f2pypy
>
> Perhaps that could
Someone tried getting f2py working on pypy a while ago, a quick search
turned up
http://www.dalkescientific.com/writings/diary/archive/2011/11/09/f2pypy.html
and a fork of code at
https://bitbucket.org/pypy/f2pypy
Perhaps that could be a starting point?
Matti
On 8/08/2012 8:05 PM, David Cournap
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Steven Jackson
wrote:
> I know there is no current plan to implement scipy in pypy, but searching
> the PyPy website, I was not able to find the reason.
>
> If it is not to be included as a feature due to lack of interest or
> developer time, I am offering to begi
Which source files/functions/line numbers should I take a look at, as
specifically as possible?
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Steven Jackson
> wrote:
> > I am definitely open to working on Numpy first, my only hesitation was
> that
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Steven Jackson
wrote:
> I am definitely open to working on Numpy first, my only hesitation was that
> it might be hard to get spun up, and scipy seemed like something I could
> slice off and do (some of) by myself without accidentally conflicting with
> ongoing dev
I am definitely open to working on Numpy first, my only hesitation was that
it might be hard to get spun up, and scipy seemed like something I could
slice off and do (some of) by myself without accidentally conflicting with
ongoing development efforts.
If, as your replies have indicated, Numpy isn
I believe the reason is that they prefer to focus the development
effort into the more "basic" Numpy and from that go on. Numpy is not
fully implemented
I am working (actually, right now I am only in the "thinking" state)
on some modules of NumPy, maybe we could coordinate and give this a
boost.
Hi Steven.
Thanks for getting to us about it.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Steven Jackson
wrote:
> I know there is no current plan to implement scipy in pypy, but searching
> the PyPy website, I was not able to find the reason.
>
> If it is not to be included as a feature due to lack of inte
I know there is no current plan to implement scipy in pypy, but searching
the PyPy website, I was not able to find the reason.
If it is not to be included as a feature due to lack of interest or
developer time, I am offering to begin rewriting scipy in pure python (I
have quite a bit of free time
10 matches
Mail list logo
