Maybe it's a good idea to find the bottleneck in the test and extend speed.pypy
suite? The more performance tests it hosts the better.
-Yury
On 2011-11-25, at 11:31 AM, Serhat Sevki Dincer wrote:
> https://bugs.pypy.org/issue940
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Piotr Skamruk
> wrote:
>>
https://bugs.pypy.org/issue940
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Piotr Skamruk wrote:
> Serhat had probably in mind that pypy1.7 is slower than cpython2.7 in this
> test.
>
> Serhat: add this as bug to bugs.pypy.org
___
pypy-dev mailing list
pypy-dev@py
Serhat had probably in mind that pypy1.7 is slower than cpython2.7 in this test.
Serhat: add this as bug to bugs.pypy.org
2011/11/25 Benjamin Peterson :
> 2011/11/25 Serhat Sevki Dincer :
>> I wrote a tiny grep with multi-line match support, and compared its
>> speed under pypy 1.7 with grep and
2011/11/25 Serhat Sevki Dincer :
> I wrote a tiny grep with multi-line match support, and compared its
> speed under pypy 1.7 with grep and CPython 2.7.1 (on ubuntu 11.04
> laptop).
> No special algorithm/implementation is employed; it is bare re module.
>
> input: Plone 4.1.2 eggs directory, size
I wrote a tiny grep with multi-line match support, and compared its
speed under pypy 1.7 with grep and CPython 2.7.1 (on ubuntu 11.04
laptop).
No special algorithm/implementation is employed; it is bare re module.
input: Plone 4.1.2 eggs directory, size 286mb, possible processed
input size is abou
