Hi Yuriy,
Looking at the situation Matti describes where some buildslaves have
not been running for months, it seems that nobody was really
interested in looking at the results enough to care about sending a
mail to their owners... So while we do appreciate some buildslaves,
and they are not a bu
Hello, Matti.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 5:40 PM Matti Picus wrote:
> I propose we remove the non-functioning build slaves. I have been trying
> to contact the owners, here is what I have so far:
>
> http://buildbot.pypy.org/builders/pypy-c-jit-freebsd-8-x86-64
> ananke: offline since at least Nov
+1 on all you propose
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Matti Picus wrote:
> I propose we remove the non-functioning build slaves. I have been trying to
> contact the owners, here is what I have so far:
>
> http://buildbot.pypy.org/builders/jit-benchmark-linux-x86-64-single-run
> speed-python-64:
I propose we remove the non-functioning build slaves. I have been trying
to contact the owners, here is what I have so far:
http://buildbot.pypy.org/builders/jit-benchmark-linux-x86-64-single-run
speed-python-64: offline since June
http://buildbot.pypy.org/builders/own-indiana-x86-32
jcea-openi