Right. I think that the geometric average is useful mostly and
primarily to gather how PyPy is improving over time, and much less to
know whether it has yet reached the speed of light as compared to
CPython ;-)
2011/7/21 Maciej Fijalkowski :
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Stefan Behnel wrot
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Massa, Harald Armin, 18.07.2011 23:30:
>>
>> I recommend to wrap the code and release it with the subtitle "the 4 times
>> faster release"
>
> Just nitpicking here, but you shouldn't forget that any given set of
> benchmarks can only ever be
Massa, Harald Armin, 18.07.2011 23:30:
I recommend to wrap the code and release it with the subtitle "the 4 times
faster release"
Just nitpicking here, but you shouldn't forget that any given set of
benchmarks can only ever be an arbitrary one. If you change the current
set, you can rightfull
@Phyo: it's because revision 45700 shows a large improvement for telco
and spitfire_stringio (40%+), which makes for an average improvement
of over 6%. See detailed changes table:
http://speed.pypy.org/changes/?tre=10&rev=45700%3Ac3294f3c5888&exe=1&env=1
Due to Maciej's commit (merge numpy-str-rep
So This is really happening in 1.6 or Speed.pypy bug?
On 7/19/11, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Massa, Harald Armin wrote:
>> I recommend to wrap the code and release it with the subtitle "the 4 times
>> faster release"
>
> I like codenames more. Like PyPy 1.6 "Ki
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Massa, Harald Armin wrote:
> I recommend to wrap the code and release it with the subtitle "the 4 times
> faster release"
I like codenames more. Like PyPy 1.6 "Kickass Panda"
> Best wishes,
> Harald
> --
> GHUM GmbH
> Harald Armin Massa
> Spielberger Straße 49
>
I recommend to wrap the code and release it with the subtitle "the 4 times
faster release"
Best wishes,
Harald
--
GHUM GmbH
Harald Armin Massa
Spielberger Straße 49
70435 Stuttgart
0173/9409607
Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 734971
-
persuadere.
et programmare
__
