Re: [pypy-dev] numpypy unit tests

2016-01-03 Thread Vincent Legoll
Hello, to launch a single test you can do it that way, assuming you're in pypy's top level and that py.test is installed on your system: py.test pypy/module/micronumpy/test/test_ndarray.py -k test_array_indexing_bool On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Sergey Matyunin wrote: > Thank you, Yury. > Loo

Re: [pypy-dev] numpypy unit tests

2016-01-03 Thread Sergey Matyunin
Thank you, Yury. Looks like your lines are already in FAQ. At least I couldn't find reasonable way to update any chapter. Thing look clear in theory. However I cannot go on in practice. How to launch any test for micronumpy in interactive mode? I suppose it should be possible to import some modul

Re: [pypy-dev] numpypy unit tests

2016-01-02 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
On Sun, 2016-01-03 at 02:07 +0100, Sergey Matyunin wrote: > > -Compiling pypy for linux on takes about 1 hour, right? Something in this range, depending on your hardware. > -Does faster build mode exist? Probably with less optimizations > (without -O3 etc.) As you might have already noticed, mo

Re: [pypy-dev] numpypy unit tests

2016-01-02 Thread Sergey Matyunin
Thanks Maciej, Matti! That was really helpful! Could you please point me to the place where I could find overview of numpypy architecture? (if it exists) I got some vision after looking at the code. I would be grateful if someone says if it’s correct. -Implementation of numpy for pypy is splitt

Re: [pypy-dev] numpypy unit tests

2016-01-02 Thread Matti Picus
On 02/01/16 01:44, Sergey Matyunin wrote: Dear Maciej, Thanks for the answer! Does it make sense to fix failing tests? Or may be they were left as is because they are irrelevant? Do numpypy developers use these tests or some other tests? Does any guidelines exist for numpypy developers? Do I ne

Re: [pypy-dev] numpypy unit tests

2016-01-01 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
yes, it makes sense to fix failing tests, they're real problems. You don't need to create the issue and you can just do the PR. This is the appropriate mailing list, but we work a lot through IRC On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 1:44 AM, Sergey Matyunin wrote: > Dear Maciej, > > Thanks for the answer! > D

Re: [pypy-dev] numpypy unit tests

2016-01-01 Thread Sergey Matyunin
Dear Maciej, Thanks for the answer! Does it make sense to fix failing tests? Or may be they were left as is because they are irrelevant? Do numpypy developers use these tests or some other tests? Does any guidelines exist for numpypy developers? Do I need to create an issue for each PR? Is this

Re: [pypy-dev] numpypy unit tests

2016-01-01 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
This is the actual state On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Sergey Matyunin wrote: > Hello, > > I am curious about the status of unit tests of numpy for pypy. Where > can I get actual information about it? > > I have installed pypy 4.0.1, numpypy for it (tag 4.0.1) and launched > numpy tests using

[pypy-dev] numpypy unit tests

2016-01-01 Thread Sergey Matyunin
Hello, I am curious about the status of unit tests of numpy for pypy. Where can I get actual information about it? I have installed pypy 4.0.1, numpypy for it (tag 4.0.1) and launched numpy tests using numpy.test() Looks like there is a plenty of failed tests: > Ran 4157 tests in 15.592s > FAILED