[pypy-dev] Clang benchmarks

Here are the llvm/clang build using the shadowstack gc. What do you think? Also, I will be downloading the prebuilt binary and running benchmarks and post them as well. Report on Linux infinity 3.1.1-gentoo #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Nov 20 03:57:03 PST 2011 x86_64 AMD Turion(tm) II Dual-Core Mobile M520

Re: [pypy-dev] RPython

Hi, On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 06:30, Rinu Boney wrote: > where can i get more information on rpython ( i have already seen what is > written in the coding guide! ) ? The coding guide describes the basics, and we have a number of examples of small interpreters besides the Python interpreter of PyPy,

Re: [pypy-dev] Clang benchmarks

Hi Justin, On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 09:09, Justin Noah wrote: > Here are the llvm/clang build using the shadowstack gc. What do you think? 1. What is the baseline you are comparing it with? 2. I assume these are normal JITting PyPys. In that case, then for benchmarks like these, it doesn't reall

[pypy-dev] python 2 and python 3 sharing an interpreter?

Hi PyPy folks, I've said so before in comments on your blog, but much kudos to the project, you guys have been doing a great job! Some time ago I tried PyPy against an artificial life experiment of mine which implemented a simple stack-based language in Python and was pleasantly surprised to

Re: [pypy-dev] python 2 and python 3 sharing an interpreter?

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote: > Hi PyPy folks, > > I've said so before in comments on your blog, but much kudos to the > project, you guys have been doing a great job! Some time ago I tried PyPy > against an artificial life experiment of mine which implemented a simple > s

Re: [pypy-dev] python 2 and python 3 sharing an interpreter?

Alex Gaynor, 08.12.2011 11:35: On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote: Would it be possible to have an interpreter that could support both Python 2 and Python 3 modules in the same runtime? I.e, an interpreter that supports importing Python 3 code from Python 2 modules, and vice v

[pypy-dev] {Positioning- URL - Review}

[email protected] : Your web site is really good but you could be missing out on a lot of online business because of where your site shows up on the major search directories. A few simple changes could greatly increase your web traffic and your bottom line. Reply to us and we will give

Re: [pypy-dev] python 2 and python 3 sharing an interpreter?

Hey, On 12/08/2011 11:35 AM, Alex Gaynor wrote: I don't think it can, or should be done, here's why: Say you have a Python 2 dictionary {"a": 3}, and you pass this over to py3k land, what does it become? Logically it becomes a {b"a": 3}, two problems: a) it now has bytes for keys, which means

Re: [pypy-dev] python 2 and python 3 sharing an interpreter?

Hey Stefan, On 12/08/2011 01:54 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote: So, assuming that Martijn was actually referring to legacy code, I agree that it won't solve the problem at hand. But that doesn't mean it would be impossible to benefit from it. Not sure what you mean here - I was referring to using ex

Re: [pypy-dev] Clang benchmarks

1. I had just run 'pypy ./runner.py' not knowing what I was actually supposed to do. I have since re-run the benchmarks, after discussing how they should properly be run, and came up with the results below. 2. These are "normal" JiTting