[pypy-dev] Splitting RPython and PyPy

2012-10-21 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
Hi Due to impressive work by Ronan Lamy, we're now able to split RPython and PyPy. Note that the fact of splitting this is not up to discussion, however, how we go about it is. During discussions with Armin we came up with the following plan: * We make a copy of pypy repo called rpython. it'll st

Re: [pypy-dev] Splitting RPython and PyPy

2012-10-21 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > Hi > > Due to impressive work by Ronan Lamy, we're now able to split RPython > and PyPy. Note that the fact of splitting this is not up to > discussion, however, how we go about it is. During discussions with > Armin we came up with the

Re: [pypy-dev] Splitting RPython and PyPy

2012-10-21 Thread Samuele Pedroni
nice! rpython is a bit long for the top package name, the only other option I can think of would be rpyc (with c = compiler or chain) though which isn't that great; in any case translate.py should become either rpythonc or rpyc, in the tradition of cc and javac etc... I can even imagine a world/

Re: [pypy-dev] Splitting RPython and PyPy

2012-10-21 Thread holger krekel
Hi Maciej, Armin, On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 14:03 +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > Hi > > Due to impressive work by Ronan Lamy, we're now able to split RPython > and PyPy. Note that the fact of splitting this is not up to > discussion, however, how we go about it is. During discussions with > Arm

Re: [pypy-dev] Splitting RPython and PyPy

2012-10-21 Thread Ronan Lamy
Le dimanche 21 octobre 2012 à 14:03 +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski a écrit : > Hi > > Due to impressive work by Ronan Lamy, we're now able to split RPython > and PyPy. Note that the fact of splitting this is not up to > discussion, however, how we go about it is. During discussions with > Armin we came

Re: [pypy-dev] Splitting RPython and PyPy

2012-10-21 Thread Antonio Cuni
On 10/21/2012 09:28 PM, Ronan Lamy wrote: >> > * testrunner and dotviewer can become independent packages > +1 (well, I don't really have an opinion on testrunner). IMO, this > implies that FunctionGraph should lose its view/show method. nothing stops us to have a .show() method which tries to l

Re: [pypy-dev] Splitting RPython and PyPy

2012-10-21 Thread Alex Gaynor
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Antonio Cuni wrote: > On 10/21/2012 09:28 PM, Ronan Lamy wrote: > >> > * testrunner and dotviewer can become independent packages > > +1 (well, I don't really have an opinion on testrunner). IMO, this > > implies that FunctionGraph should lose its view/show met

Re: [pypy-dev] Splitting RPython and PyPy

2012-10-21 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 8:30 PM, holger krekel wrote: > Hi Maciej, Armin, > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 14:03 +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: >> Hi >> >> Due to impressive work by Ronan Lamy, we're now able to split RPython >> and PyPy. Note that the fact of splitting this is not up to >> discussio