[pypy-issue] [issue629] "Cannot find gc roots" messages on Linux

2013-02-18 Thread klankschap
klankschap added the comment: On 18 Feb 2013, at 17:31, Armin Rigo wrote: > > Armin Rigo added the comment: > > klankschap: you need to give us more information, ideally a way to reproduce > it > (e.g. the complete script you're running). As i mentioned, it appe

[pypy-issue] [issue1401] ImportError: No module named ...

2013-02-18 Thread klankschap
New submission from klankschap : pypy fails to recognize a module with only .pyc files in it. try this: mkdir module touch module/__init__.py touch module/one.py python -c "from module import one" rm module/*.py python -c "from module import one" python -c "import mo

[pypy-issue] [issue629] "Cannot find gc roots" messages on Linux

2013-02-17 Thread klankschap
klankschap added the comment: while using multiprocessing Pool i do (randomly) get this message. 'cannot find gc roots!' The pool tasks continue, but it will fail the join() (using 24d0ce574830 feb 12 2013 on ubuntu) -- nosy: +klankschap release: ??? -> 2.0 status: r

[pypy-issue] [issue1381] random() generator returning result outside the 0.0 .. 1.0 domain.

2013-01-31 Thread klankschap
klankschap added the comment: On 31 Jan 2013, at 22:11, Amaury Forgeot d Arc wrote: > > Amaury Forgeot d Arc added the comment: > > Fixed with 0ec3d77645a2: jumpahead() won't generate numbers above 1.0. > > Precise numbers will differ from CPython though. It seem

[pypy-issue] [issue1381] random() generator returning result outside the 0.0 .. 1.0 domain.

2013-01-25 Thread klankschap
klankschap added the comment: On 25 Jan 2013, at 11:37, Amaury Forgeot d Arc wrote: > > Amaury Forgeot d Arc added the comment: > >> With the jumpahead() , setstate() and getstate() you can keep independent >> streams for each class for every unit. >> But if ther

[pypy-issue] [issue1381] random() generator returning result outside the 0.0 .. 1.0 domain.

2013-01-23 Thread klankschap
klankschap added the comment: On 23 Jan 2013, at 21:18, Amaury Forgeot d Arc wrote: > > Amaury Forgeot d Arc added the comment: > > Unfortunately the unit test added by CPython > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/6df0b4ed8617 > already passes with PyPy. Did you experi

[pypy-issue] [issue1381] random() generator returning result outside the 0.0 .. 1.0 domain.

2013-01-23 Thread klankschap
New submission from klankschap : in python 2.7.3 there is an issue with the random() generator returning result outside the 0.0 .. 1.0 domain. in their bugtracker as issue 14591 the current pypy suffers from the same issue. could it be corrected as well, as a lot of (internal) things depend on