On Thursday 02 March 2006 9:07 am, Sreeram Kandallu wrote:
Hi
I just have a couple of questions regarding conventions that are being
followed in PyQt4.
I'm using the '20060226' snapshots of PyQt4 and Sip, and i noticed that
the Qt namespace is present in *both* QtCore and QtGui! why is
Phil Thompson wrote:
The short answer is that the Python objects are placed in the module
corresponding to the C++ library in which they are implemented.
Does this mean that Qt::WindowFlags and such will be moved from
QtCore.Qt to QtGui.Qt?
Regards
Sreeram
signature.asc
Description:
On Thursday 02 March 2006 9:59 am, Sreeram Kandallu wrote:
Phil Thompson wrote:
The short answer is that the Python objects are placed in the module
corresponding to the C++ library in which they are implemented.
Does this mean that Qt::WindowFlags and such will be moved from
QtCore.Qt to
On 02.03.06 00:36:03, Hai Zaar wrote:
No matter what I've tried, I've failed to compile sip-4.3.2 - it
failed to find qmail specs.
You mean Qt mkspecs...
I have qt compiled and installed to /usr with the following configure options:
That might be the case, but...
-fname =
On 3/2/06, Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02.03.06 00:36:03, Hai Zaar wrote:
No matter what I've tried, I've failed to compile sip-4.3.2 - it
failed to find qmail specs.
You mean Qt mkspecs...
Late night, you know... :)
I have qt compiled and installed to /usr with the
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:46:03AM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
The short answer is that the Python objects are placed in the module
corresponding to the C++ library in which they are implemented.
Hmm, meaning that this:
---[ Code snippet ]
On 02.03.06 12:21:26, Hai Zaar wrote:
On 3/2/06, Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02.03.06 00:36:03, Hai Zaar wrote:
I have qt compiled and installed to /usr with the following configure
options:
That might be the case, but...
-fname = os.path.join(qt_dir,
On Thursday 02 March 2006 10:21 am, Sundance wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:46:03AM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
The short answer is that the Python objects are placed in the module
corresponding to the C++ library in which they are implemented.
Hmm, meaning that this:
---[ Code snippet
To give you an idea how Debian does that. This way you can safely set
QTDIR to /usr/share/qt3 and Qt still finds includes, libs, plugins and
so on.
Yes, but the original problem was that sip could not find qmake specs,
once it found and read them, it had no troubles finding, say,
libraries
Phil Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Up until recently I had planned (and partially implemented) the idea that
a
namespace would only appear once and that any objects implemented in other
modules would be placed in it. In other words...
from PyQt4 import QtCore
dir(QtCore)
from PyQt4
Hello,
For the past few months, I have been using a statically-compiled version of
PyQt. Statically here means that it's still an external module (.pyd) but
it does not depend on the external C++ Qt DLL: the module is totally
self-contained. This bring several advantages:
- Size. A static
On 02.03.06 12:59:23, Hai Zaar wrote:
To give you an idea how Debian does that. This way you can safely set
QTDIR to /usr/share/qt3 and Qt still finds includes, libs, plugins and
so on.
Yes, but the original problem was that sip could not find qmake specs,
Right and that was caused by you
On 02.03.06 12:09:46, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
Phil Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Up until recently I had planned (and partially implemented) the idea that
a
namespace would only appear once and that any objects implemented in other
modules would be placed in it. In other words...
from
On Thursday 02 March 2006 11:09 am, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
Phil Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Up until recently I had planned (and partially implemented) the idea that
a
namespace would only appear once and that any objects implemented in
other modules would be placed in it. In other
Giovanni Bajo wrote:
Are you saying that this:
---
from PyQt4.QtCore import *
from PyQt4.QtGui import *
dir(Qt)
---
won't show the full Qt namespace, thus making PyQt4 unusable without the
annoying QtCore/QtGui prefix in front of
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:41:45AM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
A C++ namespace doesn't have an implementation, it just contributes to
name mangling. In Python they have to be implemented by something so
there is no direct comparison.
Point! Although I feel Giovanni does have a point as well.
Phil Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---
from PyQt4.QtCore import *
from PyQt4.QtGui import *
dir(Qt)
---
won't show the full Qt namespace, thus making PyQt4 unusable without the
annoying QtCore/QtGui prefix in front of everything?
Yes
Sundance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Having the Qt namespace as an external module.
Perfect. I'm +1 on this.
2) Updating QtCore.Qt's _dict_ in the other modules instead of
creating a new Qt there.
This would be *very* confusing and very implicit. I'm -1000 on this.
--
Giovanni Bajo
Giovanni Bajo wrote:
This would be *very* confusing and very implicit. I'm -1000 on this.
Actually, it's more than merely implicit: it's Plain Freaking Magic.
And magic is dangerous.
I agree that making the Qt namespace a module of its own would be one
darn lot better. What I don't know is
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 12:42:42 +0100
Sundance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:41:45AM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
A C++ namespace doesn't have an implementation, it just contributes to
name mangling. In Python they have to be implemented by something so
there is no
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 15:26:50 +0100
Gerard Vermeulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been wondering for some time if it wouldn't be better to merge QtCore
and QtGui into one single module. This resolves the problem of the Qt
namespace
clashes. Eventually there could be a QtCore module for
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:01:35PM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
As I said in another reply - I don't see the difference. Whether it's
PyQt4.Qt rather than PyQt4.QtCore.Qt, the magic still has to happen
when you import QtGui.
Well, I think the idea is that the Qt namespace would contain
On Thursday 02 March 2006 2:26 pm, Gerard Vermeulen wrote:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 12:42:42 +0100
Sundance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:41:45AM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
A C++ namespace doesn't have an implementation, it just contributes to
name mangling. In Python
Gerard Vermeulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been wondering for some time if it wouldn't be better to merge
QtCore
and QtGui into one single module. This resolves the problem of the Qt
namespace clashes. Eventually there could be a QtCore module for people
who really only need QtCore
On Thursday 02 March 2006 2:45 pm, Sundance wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:01:35PM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
As I said in another reply - I don't see the difference. Whether it's
PyQt4.Qt rather than PyQt4.QtCore.Qt, the magic still has to happen
when you import QtGui.
Well, I think
On Thursday 02 March 2006 2:38 pm, Gerard Vermeulen wrote:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 15:26:50 +0100
Gerard Vermeulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been wondering for some time if it wouldn't be better to merge
QtCore and QtGui into one single module. This resolves the problem of
the Qt
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:58:18PM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
What you describe can be implemented, but it means that the Qt module
must be linked against the Core and Gui Qt libraries.
Oookay, you've lost me there. I thought that, with the exception of
convertFromPlainText(), escape() and
On Thursday 02 March 2006 3:43 pm, Sundance wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:58:18PM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
What you describe can be implemented, but it means that the Qt module
must be linked against the Core and Gui Qt libraries.
Oookay, you've lost me there. I thought that, with
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 03:15:45PM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
I like it - except I would use Qt rather than qt. In fact I
really, really like it.
Ditto!
Giovanni, say: would that also remove the drawback from your awesome
static PyQt module project? I looked into the issue of distributing
Sundance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like it - except I would use Qt rather than qt. In fact I
really, really like it.
Ditto!
Giovanni, say: would that also remove the drawback from your awesome
static PyQt module project? I looked into the issue of distributing
easy-to-install binaries
I am trying to set the width of a vertical scrollbar (or any for that
matter) of a QScrollArea. I use PyQt4, kde-3.5.1, and the default
plastic syle. The size prints 50 for each scrollbar, but the width does
not change. Ideas? thanks in advance.
from PyQt4.QtGui import *
from PyQt4.QtCore import
As long as it is going to be fairly simple, you could use QSimpleRichText
(alsuming Qt3). It allows for basic html-like styling and tables. It's kind
of picky and the html support isn't well documented (well, there are a number
of things that are available though not documented). You can
32 matches
Mail list logo
