Jason Voegele wrote:
I answered this in my reply to Giovanni. My QThread derivatives are in
Python. From what I've read so far, that sounds like bad news. :(
Well, only in so much as you should spawn of processes to do this
work... Encoding sounds like something that should be pretty easily
Toby Dickenson wrote:
* Startup time while your modules are imported. Plan to have a splash screen
with a progress bar :-(
How do you do this with PyQt?
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
Giovanni Bajo wrote:
http://code.activestate.com/recipes/496746/
The RestrictedPython package is probably a more robust and maintained
version of this...
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
Phil Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:19:50 -0500, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com
wrote:
A bit nasty, since I see (and follow) lots of examples that say:
from PyQt4.QtCore import *
This redefines the builtin hex.
Check the Roadmap.
Appending a _ just to make an unpleasant style of
Phil Thompson wrote:
This has been discussed thousands of times and it starts getting
annoying.
Yes, it is annoying that all the example code continues to be in a form
that confuses users trying to learn PyQt.
*None* of the PyQt4 examples uses star imports.
Hmmm, apologies then, must have
Giovanni Bajo wrote:
On mer, 2009-01-07 at 09:26 +, Chris Withers wrote:
Phil Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:19:50 -0500, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com
wrote:
A bit nasty, since I see (and follow) lots of examples that say:
from PyQt4.QtCore import *
This redefines the builtin
Neal Becker wrote:
If the pyqt examples did not use *, and if you could import a useful enough
subset without doing that, I'd agree. If the suggestion is to explicitly
qualify everything, I don't think that's reasonable.
Yes, python, well know for believing that implicit is better than
David Boddie wrote:
http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/software/sip/intro
IS there no way to package up an application such that you don't need to
seperately install python, pyqt4 and then the app?
In theory:
http://www.diotavelli.net/PyQtWiki/Deploying_PyQt_Applications
Cool, thanks for
Hey All,
Apologies for the newbie questions, I'm still trying to decide what gui
toolkit I want to use and so would like to give Qt4 a go. Everything I
do is in python, so that leads me to PyQt4 ;-)
I'm currently doing entirely open soruce development on Windows.
However, I wouldn't like to
Output is as follows:
PyKDE version 3.11.3
---
Python include directory is /usr/include/python2.4
Python version is 2.4.0
sip version is 4.2.1 (4.2.1)
Qt directory is /usr/lib/qt-3.3
Qt version is 3.3.4
PyQt directory is /usr/share/sip
PyQt version is 3.14.1 (3.14.1)
KDE
10 matches
Mail list logo
