Re: [PyKDE] PyQt v4 Roadmap

2005-02-18 Thread Longson, Joe
I think we are all arguing from the same side of the issue. I agree that namespaces are important, I'm just asking several questions: 1. Why add an additional namespace for qt4 related functionality (we didn't do this for qt3)? In terms of code maintainability, it will actually save me time

Re: [PyKDE] PyQt v4 Roadmap

2005-02-17 Thread Longson, Joe
t.   This is really good news. Joe Truls A. Tangstad wrote: On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 08:05:49AM -0800, Longson, Joe wrote: The separate Qt v4 libraries will be wrapped as separate Python modules. The module names will be the same as the corresponding library (eg. QtCore, QtGui

Re: [PyKDE] PyQt v4 Roadmap

2005-02-17 Thread Longson, Joe
Would we be required to use the from PyQt4 import QtGui? The existing namespace allows us to do "import qt" Could a similar facility be provided? (for maintaining more code compatibility) e.g. In qt.py -- from PyQt4 import * from PyQt4.QtGui import * ... Then we could do something li