Hi Andreas,
On Friday 20 January 2006 21:24, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 20.01.06 20:53:13, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > On Friday 20 January 2006 20:03, Jim Bublitz wrote:
> > > On an 800MHz machine with a 100MHz front side bus, the concatenated
> > > version using gcc 3 takes about
On Friday 20 January 2006 11:53, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> On Friday 20 January 2006 20:03, Jim Bublitz wrote:
> > On an 800MHz machine with a 100MHz front side bus, the concatenated
> > version using gcc 3 takes about 45 minutes, the non-concatenated version
> > with gcc 4 takes about 7
On 20.01.06 20:53:13, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> On Friday 20 January 2006 20:03, Jim Bublitz wrote:
> > On an 800MHz machine with a 100MHz front side bus, the concatenated version
> > using gcc 3 takes about 45 minutes, the non-concatenated version with gcc 4
> > takes about 75 minutes,
Hi Jim,
On Friday 20 January 2006 20:03, Jim Bublitz wrote:
> On an 800MHz machine with a 100MHz front side bus, the concatenated version
> using gcc 3 takes about 45 minutes, the non-concatenated version with gcc 4
> takes about 75 minutes, and (as I recall) the non-concatenated version with
> gc
On Thursday 19 January 2006 06:31, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 19.01.06 14:22:53, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 18.01.06 23:01:01, Jim Bublitz wrote:
> > > I also need feedback on whether this snapshot builds on various systems
> > > - I currently am only setup to test on SuSE so none of this has b
On 19.01.06 14:22:53, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 18.01.06 23:01:01, Jim Bublitz wrote:
> > I also need feedback on whether this snapshot builds on various systems - I
> > currently am only setup to test on SuSE so none of this has been tested on
> > Fedora, Mandriva, Ubuntu or Gentoo. I don't ex
