> I'd need to read the code a bit more and get something working with Qt 3
> before I could be sure it would work with Qt 4. There's probably a good
> reason why the code is currently arranged the way it is.
The only reason will be to follow the pattern of other platform ports.
That's not a "good
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 20:04, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> I haven't changed the drawingcode (in PlatQt.cpp) much at all. So just look
> in there for how QScintilla works.. Basically, It has a "Surface" object
> that gets instantiated in paintEvent, and the drawing happens in calls to
> other sci
On July 6, 2005 12:07 pm, David Boddie wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Jul 2005 18:46:32, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> >And you were 100% correct. It now "works", but is still using the qt3
> > support classes (I'll fix that eventually). And I'm getting this odd
> > warning: QPainter::begin: Widget painting can
On Tue, 05 Jul 2005 18:46:32, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
>And you were 100% correct. It now "works", but is still using the qt3 support
>classes (I'll fix that eventually). And I'm getting this odd warning:
>QPainter::begin: Widget painting can only begin as a result of a paintEvent
Yes, you shoul
> On July 5, 2005 03:11 pm, Phil Thompson wrote:
>> On Tuesday 05 July 2005 8:55 pm, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
>> > I know the whole Qt4 thing has come up time and time again, but
>> hopefully
>> > my questions are a little different ;)
>> >
>> > How much work has already gone into porting Scintilla
On July 5, 2005 03:11 pm, you wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 July 2005 8:55 pm, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > Was hoping to get it to work under qt4, but I have no idea how much work
> > it'll be to get QScintilla to work with it..
>
> I don't expect that it will take much work.
And you were 100% correct.
On July 5, 2005 03:29 pm, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
>
> we shall see.
>
Wow, quite a few "(obsolete)" methods being used... And they were "(obsolete)" in qt3 :o
--
Thomas Fjellstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
PyKDE mailing listPyKDE@mats.imk.fraunhofer.
On July 5, 2005 03:11 pm, Phil Thompson wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 July 2005 8:55 pm, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > I know the whole Qt4 thing has come up time and time again, but hopefully
> > my questions are a little different ;)
> >
> > How much work has already gone into porting Scintilla to Qt4?
>
On Tuesday 05 July 2005 8:55 pm, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> I know the whole Qt4 thing has come up time and time again, but hopefully
> my questions are a little different ;)
>
> How much work has already gone into porting Scintilla to Qt4?
None.
> If any has been done, would I be able to get my
I know the whole Qt4 thing has come up time and time again, but hopefully my
questions are a little different ;)
How much work has already gone into porting Scintilla to Qt4?
If any has been done, would I be able to get my hands on it? I'd prefer not to
have to start from scratch ;)
I'm assumin
10 matches
Mail list logo
