On Thursday 02 March 2006 9:07 am, Sreeram Kandallu wrote:
Hi
I just have a couple of questions regarding conventions that are being
followed in PyQt4.
I'm using the '20060226' snapshots of PyQt4 and Sip, and i noticed that
the Qt namespace is present in *both* QtCore and QtGui! why is
Phil Thompson wrote:
The short answer is that the Python objects are placed in the module
corresponding to the C++ library in which they are implemented.
Does this mean that Qt::WindowFlags and such will be moved from
QtCore.Qt to QtGui.Qt?
Regards
Sreeram
signature.asc
Description:
On Thursday 02 March 2006 9:59 am, Sreeram Kandallu wrote:
Phil Thompson wrote:
The short answer is that the Python objects are placed in the module
corresponding to the C++ library in which they are implemented.
Does this mean that Qt::WindowFlags and such will be moved from
QtCore.Qt to
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:46:03AM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
The short answer is that the Python objects are placed in the module
corresponding to the C++ library in which they are implemented.
Hmm, meaning that this:
---[ Code snippet ]
On Thursday 02 March 2006 10:21 am, Sundance wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:46:03AM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
The short answer is that the Python objects are placed in the module
corresponding to the C++ library in which they are implemented.
Hmm, meaning that this:
---[ Code snippet
Phil Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Up until recently I had planned (and partially implemented) the idea that
a
namespace would only appear once and that any objects implemented in other
modules would be placed in it. In other words...
from PyQt4 import QtCore
dir(QtCore)
from PyQt4
On 02.03.06 12:09:46, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
Phil Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Up until recently I had planned (and partially implemented) the idea that
a
namespace would only appear once and that any objects implemented in other
modules would be placed in it. In other words...
from
On Thursday 02 March 2006 11:09 am, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
Phil Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Up until recently I had planned (and partially implemented) the idea that
a
namespace would only appear once and that any objects implemented in
other modules would be placed in it. In other
Giovanni Bajo wrote:
Are you saying that this:
---
from PyQt4.QtCore import *
from PyQt4.QtGui import *
dir(Qt)
---
won't show the full Qt namespace, thus making PyQt4 unusable without the
annoying QtCore/QtGui prefix in front of
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:41:45AM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
A C++ namespace doesn't have an implementation, it just contributes to
name mangling. In Python they have to be implemented by something so
there is no direct comparison.
Point! Although I feel Giovanni does have a point as well.
Phil Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---
from PyQt4.QtCore import *
from PyQt4.QtGui import *
dir(Qt)
---
won't show the full Qt namespace, thus making PyQt4 unusable without the
annoying QtCore/QtGui prefix in front of everything?
Yes
Sundance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Having the Qt namespace as an external module.
Perfect. I'm +1 on this.
2) Updating QtCore.Qt's _dict_ in the other modules instead of
creating a new Qt there.
This would be *very* confusing and very implicit. I'm -1000 on this.
--
Giovanni Bajo
Giovanni Bajo wrote:
This would be *very* confusing and very implicit. I'm -1000 on this.
Actually, it's more than merely implicit: it's Plain Freaking Magic.
And magic is dangerous.
I agree that making the Qt namespace a module of its own would be one
darn lot better. What I don't know is
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 12:42:42 +0100
Sundance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:41:45AM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
A C++ namespace doesn't have an implementation, it just contributes to
name mangling. In Python they have to be implemented by something so
there is no
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 15:26:50 +0100
Gerard Vermeulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been wondering for some time if it wouldn't be better to merge QtCore
and QtGui into one single module. This resolves the problem of the Qt
namespace
clashes. Eventually there could be a QtCore module for
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:01:35PM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
As I said in another reply - I don't see the difference. Whether it's
PyQt4.Qt rather than PyQt4.QtCore.Qt, the magic still has to happen
when you import QtGui.
Well, I think the idea is that the Qt namespace would contain
On Thursday 02 March 2006 2:26 pm, Gerard Vermeulen wrote:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 12:42:42 +0100
Sundance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:41:45AM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
A C++ namespace doesn't have an implementation, it just contributes to
name mangling. In Python
Gerard Vermeulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been wondering for some time if it wouldn't be better to merge
QtCore
and QtGui into one single module. This resolves the problem of the Qt
namespace clashes. Eventually there could be a QtCore module for people
who really only need QtCore
On Thursday 02 March 2006 2:45 pm, Sundance wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:01:35PM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
As I said in another reply - I don't see the difference. Whether it's
PyQt4.Qt rather than PyQt4.QtCore.Qt, the magic still has to happen
when you import QtGui.
Well, I think
On Thursday 02 March 2006 2:38 pm, Gerard Vermeulen wrote:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 15:26:50 +0100
Gerard Vermeulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been wondering for some time if it wouldn't be better to merge
QtCore and QtGui into one single module. This resolves the problem of
the Qt
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:58:18PM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
What you describe can be implemented, but it means that the Qt module
must be linked against the Core and Gui Qt libraries.
Oookay, you've lost me there. I thought that, with the exception of
convertFromPlainText(), escape() and
On Thursday 02 March 2006 3:43 pm, Sundance wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:58:18PM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
What you describe can be implemented, but it means that the Qt module
must be linked against the Core and Gui Qt libraries.
Oookay, you've lost me there. I thought that, with
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 03:15:45PM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
I like it - except I would use Qt rather than qt. In fact I
really, really like it.
Ditto!
Giovanni, say: would that also remove the drawback from your awesome
static PyQt module project? I looked into the issue of distributing
Sundance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like it - except I would use Qt rather than qt. In fact I
really, really like it.
Ditto!
Giovanni, say: would that also remove the drawback from your awesome
static PyQt module project? I looked into the issue of distributing
easy-to-install binaries
24 matches
Mail list logo
