On Saturday 18 March 2006 3:52 pm, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
Phil Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil, the testcase is indeed fixed, but not the original bug in my
application. I will try reducing a new testcase for the problem,
That was faster than expected:
Hopefully fixed this time.
Phil Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil, the testcase is indeed fixed, but not the original bug in my
application. I will try reducing a new testcase for the problem,
That was faster than expected:
Hopefully fixed this time.
Uhm, but you broke the original testcase again! For
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 12:03 pm, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
Giovanni Bajo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil, the testcase is indeed fixed, but not the original bug in my
application. I will try reducing a new testcase for the problem,
That was faster than expected:
Hopefully fixed this time.
Phil
Phil Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using PyQt snapshot-20051212 and SIP snapshot-20051212:
---
from qt import *
app = QApplication([])
o = QObject(None)
w = QWidget(None)
QObject.connect(o, PYSIGNAL(FOO), w.update)
Giovanni Bajo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil, the testcase is indeed fixed, but not the original bug in my
application. I will try reducing a new testcase for the problem,
That was faster than expected:
==
from qt import *
app = QApplication([])
o =
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 4:34 pm, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
Phil,
Using PyQt snapshot-20051212 and SIP snapshot-20051212:
---
from qt import *
app = QApplication([])
o = QObject(None)
w = QWidget(None)
QObject.connect(o,
