On Friday 13 January 2006 03:10, Michael Franz Aigner wrote:
> On 1/12/06, Jim Bublitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > PS: If the author of the patch is still reading the list, or someone is
> > sure who it is, I'd like to credit it.
> Yes, I am still reading the list.
> I didn't take part in the
On 1/12/06, Jim Bublitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> PS: If the author of the patch is still reading the list, or someone is sure
> who it is, I'd like to credit it.
Yes, I am still reading the list.
I didn't take part in the discussion because, though I wrote the
patch, I do have similar thoug
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 21:27, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 12 January 2006 01:11, Akos Polster wrote:
> > On Wednesday 11 January 2006 20:36, Jim Bublitz wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 11 January 2006 06:49, Akos Polster wrote:
> > > > Jim, I agree with all your worries but
> > > >
Hi,
On Thursday 12 January 2006 01:11, Akos Polster wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 January 2006 20:36, Jim Bublitz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 11 January 2006 06:49, Akos Polster wrote:
> > > Jim, I agree with all your worries but
> > >
> > > - don't we have a patch already making scalars types work? All we
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 20:36, Jim Bublitz wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 January 2006 06:49, Akos Polster wrote:
> > Jim, I agree with all your worries but
> >
> > - don't we have a patch already making scalars types work? All we are
> > asking for is to include it in the official release (assuming
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 06:49, Akos Polster wrote:
> Jim, I agree with all your worries but
>
> - don't we have a patch already making scalars types work? All we are
> asking for is to include it in the official release (assuming you can
> live with its quality)
One problem is that I don't ha
Jim, I agree with all your worries but
- don't we have a patch already making scalars types work? All we are
asking for is to include it in the official release (assuming you can
live with its quality)
- dropping KConfigSkeleton means dropping the whole
KConfigDialogManager framework.
I'd prefer
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 12:55, Jim Bublitz wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 January 2006 11:11, Andrey Golovizin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 22 November 2005 (Вт) 22:54 Jim Bublitz wrote:
> > > On Saturday 19 November 2005 17:40, Akos Polster wrote:
> > > > Hi, is this fixed in any Riverbank snapshots? I seem t
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 11:11, Andrey Golovizin wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 November 2005 (Вт) 22:54 Jim Bublitz wrote:
> > On Saturday 19 November 2005 17:40, Akos Polster wrote:
> > > Hi, is this fixed in any Riverbank snapshots? I seem to have the same
> > > problem with 20050829.
> >
> > No - it'
what's the c++ => python LOC factor? I'd place it at roughly 10 to 1.
heh.
Den Jan 10, 2006 kl. 10:11 AM skrev Andrey Golovizin:
On Tuesday 22 November 2005 (Вт) 22:54 Jim Bublitz wrote:
On Saturday 19 November 2005 17:40, Akos Polster wrote:
Hi, is this fixed in any Riverbank snapshots? I se
On Tuesday 22 November 2005 (Вт) 22:54 Jim Bublitz wrote:
> On Saturday 19 November 2005 17:40, Akos Polster wrote:
> > Hi, is this fixed in any Riverbank snapshots? I seem to have the same
> > problem with 20050829.
>
> No - it'll probably get picked up in the next snapshot, probably after
> Thank
On Saturday 19 November 2005 17:40, Akos Polster wrote:
> Hi, is this fixed in any Riverbank snapshots? I seem to have the same
> problem with 20050829.
>
No - it'll probably get picked up in the next snapshot, probably after
Thanksgiving (this Thursday).
Jim
> Andrey Golovizin wrote:
> > Hi! I
Hi, is this fixed in any Riverbank snapshots? I seem to have the same
problem with 20050829.
Thanks
~ Akos.
Andrey Golovizin wrote:
> Hi! I'm currently trying to use KConfigSkeleton from PyKDE. After some
> (unsuccessful) attempts to use bool and int items I did some googling and
> found the
13 matches
Mail list logo
