[PyQt] Re: LGPL license.

2009-02-11 Thread Thorsten Kampe
* Jim Bublitz (Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:13:51 -0800) > I've never minded people using my software for free - even > commercially. I just hate it when they whine about software being > free, but not on terms where they can profit enormously from other > people's work. It's the whining, not the profiting,

Re: [PyQt] Re: LGPL license.

2009-02-10 Thread Jim Bublitz
On Tuesday 10 February 2009 13:30:24 pm Robert Kern wrote: > > pyKDE is ??? LGPL??? > > No, PyKDE is GPL. > >http://sourceforge.net/projects/pykde PyKDE4 is LGPL (per KDE request, more or less). The docs are (were?) Creative Commons. I'm not sure what PyKDE3 is - it's basically whatever I wa

[PyQt] Re: LGPL license.

2009-02-10 Thread Robert Kern
On 2009-02-10 15:10, Knapp wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote: On 10.02.09 19:56:44, Knapp wrote: I see that the newer QT4.5 has the LGPL license. Does this mean that pyQT will also have this license? Does using this license mean that you can use the lib and write a

[PyQt] Re: LGPL license.

2009-02-10 Thread Wolfgang Rohdewald
On Dienstag, 10. Februar 2009, Knapp wrote: > Why do we live? not for searching the pyqt archives :-) -- Wolfgang ___ PyQt mailing listPyQt@riverbankcomputing.com http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt