Hans-Peter Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and next time, you're facing empty widgets unexpectedly, it will ring a huge
> bell somewhere between your ears.. ;-)
Oh, yes. I guess this is a typical beginner's mistake. ;-)
BTW: thank you very much for PyQt (and thanks to Qt developers if some
Am Freitag, 20. Juli 2007 13:00 schrieb Florent Rougon:
> Giovanni Bajo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It is not what Qt does. PyQt doesn't play tricks with object lifetimes:
> > it exposes Qt's underlying object model.
>
> [...]
>
> OK, thanks to you and Phil for the answers. It makes sense now.
Giovanni Bajo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is not what Qt does. PyQt doesn't play tricks with object lifetimes: it
> exposes Qt's underlying object model.
[...]
OK, thanks to you and Phil for the answers. It makes sense now.
Regards,
--
Florent
_
On Friday 20 July 2007 11:17 am, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:56:38 +0200, Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > I thought it should be possible to have the views keep a reference to
> > their model without "owning" it, as you say. For instance:
> >
> > view1.setModel
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:56:38 +0200, Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I thought it should be possible to have the views keep a reference to
> their model without "owning" it, as you say. For instance:
>
> view1.setModel(model)
>
> internally would do 'view1.model = model'
>
> and s
