Le 12/3/2009, "Arnold Krille" <arn...@arnoldarts.de> a écrit:
>Hi, > >On Thursday 12 March 2009 07:59:10 Damien Elmes wrote: >> Currently the list defaults to the original author when replying. What >> do you think about changing it to default to replying to the whole >> list instead? As it stands, people have to go out of their way to >> make their replies and advice public. > >You mean mangling the reply-to: -header? > >There is always great discussions on all the mailinglists where this is >changed (either from or to mangling...) >The objective results of these discussions I know so far: >1) Mangling the reply-to: -header is not rfc conformant. >2) Getting good mail-client helps because it recognizes the mailinglist- >headers and automaticly replies to the list. >At least kmail here does, I didn't have to fuzz with the receivers address to >answer in public... > >But whether or not this is changed, some people will always complain and some >people will always answer to private when they should have answered in public. I agree; this is not simple. I also prefer a reply to the list, but most people don't. People often use 'Reply to all', so the message goes to the ML *and* to the sender. But in this case, I only receive the message without header (the private copy), so it is not filtered and automatically put it my PyQt folder. I think that the robot is configured to only send one copy in such case, which is a good thing, but is there a way to configure it so I receive the message to the list, and not the private one? PyQT is not the only list in this case; I think this is a mailman issue... -- Frédéric _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list PyQt@riverbankcomputing.com http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt