Perfect. Thank you!
On Mar 9, 2012, at 9:11 AM, Chris Kees wrote:
> OK, I added an issue on github. I think for me all I need is a switch I can
> use to force the setting (or not) of _POSIX_BARRIERS_MINE. The reason
> -U_POSIX_BARRIERS_MINE didn't work is that the logic in blosc.c overwrites
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Daπid wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
> > 1) What you described. Every process writes out its own library and then
> > a post-process sweeps through and combines them all later. This is
> > probably the easiest to implement. You
OK, I added an issue on github. I think for me all I need is a switch I can
use to force the setting (or not) of _POSIX_BARRIERS_MINE. The reason
-U_POSIX_BARRIERS_MINE didn't work is that the logic in blosc.c overwrites
it...
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Francesc Alted wrote:
> Excellent!
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
> 1) What you described. Every process writes out its own library and then
> a post-process sweeps through and combines them all later. This is
> probably the easiest to implement. You wouldn't even need to dump them
> to ASCII. Tables hav
