A Sunday 30 January 2011 23:38:48 Anthony Scopatz escrigué:
> Hey Tom,
>
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Tom Fawcett
wrote:
> > Thanks for your response. I suspect you are right that sets are
> > not regular enough. Are all column types of fixed size? Is this
> > a necessary condition for
A Sunday 30 January 2011 08:20:01 Tom Fawcett escrigué:
> Hi. I recently discovered pytables, and I’m impressed with its speed
> and flexibility. But there’s one feature I’d like and I can’t
> figure out how whether pytables can do it.
>
> I’d like to have essentially a set-valued column in a ta
Hey Tom,
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Tom Fawcett wrote:
> Thanks for your response. I suspect you are right that sets are not
> regular enough. Are all column types of fixed size? Is this a necessary
> condition for pytables? I though I’d seen an example of variable-length
> strings wit
Hi Anthony,
Thanks for your response. I suspect you are right that sets are not regular
enough. Are all column types of fixed size? Is this a necessary condition for
pytables? I though I’d seen an example of variable-length strings with
pytables, but I maybe I was mistaken.
I was thinking
Hey Tom,
I am not sure what you are asking is possible. I don't think sets are
regular enough* container type. Perhaps if you had a sets of consistent (or
maximal) length and primitive data type, this kind of thing would be
possible. (Eg every set in your column only contained integers and has l
Hi. I recently discovered pytables, and I’m impressed with its speed and
flexibility. But there’s one feature I’d like and I can’t figure out how
whether pytables can do it.
I’d like to have essentially a set-valued column in a table. I’d like a column
data type that is very similar to a Pyt
