I am glad =)
On Apr 8, 2013 12:44 PM, "Julio Trevisan" wrote:
> Hey Anthony
>
> Thanks a lot for this. Your method with map() works around 3 times
> faster!
>
>
> BEFORE:
> (database)DEBUG:BOVESPA.VISTA.PETR4: took 0.096931 seconds to do
> everything else
> (database)DEBUG:BOVESPA.VISTA.PETR4
Hey Anthony
Thanks a lot for this. Your method with map() works around 3 times
faster!
BEFORE:
(database)DEBUG:BOVESPA.VISTA.PETR4: took 0.096931 seconds to do everything
else
(database)DEBUG:BOVESPA.VISTA.PETR4: took 0.780372 seconds to ZIP
AFTER:
(database)DEBUG:BOVESPA.VISTA.PETR4: took
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Julio Trevisan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just joined this list, I am using PyTables for my project and it works
> great and fast.
>
> I am just trying to optimize some parts of the program and I noticed that
> zipping the tuples to get one tuple per column takes much long
Hi,
I just joined this list, I am using PyTables for my project and it works
great and fast.
I am just trying to optimize some parts of the program and I noticed that
zipping the tuples to get one tuple per column takes much longer than
reading the data itself. The thing is that readWhere() retur
