Great, that all seems to have worked quickly. Thanks for improving the
pytest ecosystem!
On Thu 02 May 2019 at 21:52 +0300, Arseniy Antonov wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> Will do it in 1 day.
> Also, GitHub is pretty friendly and routes all requests after transferring
> to the new URL.
>
>
>
>
> чт, 2 мая
Thanks!
Will do it in 1 day.
Also, GitHub is pretty friendly and routes all requests after transferring
to the new URL.
чт, 2 мая 2019 г. в 21:49, Bruno Oliveira :
>
> On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 3:45 PM Arseniy Antonov
> wrote:
>
>> I've initialized transfer process to you (Bruno)
>> And added y
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 3:45 PM Arseniy Antonov
wrote:
> I've initialized transfer process to you (Bruno)
> And added you and Floris as a maintainer in PyPi.
>
Thanks Anseniy,
I have completed the transfer, everything should be in place (let me know
otherwise).
The next step is probably to upda
I've initialized transfer process to you (Bruno)
And added you and Floris as a maintainer in PyPi.
чт, 2 мая 2019 г. в 21:38, Bruno Oliveira :
> Hi everyone
>
> On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 3:27 PM Arseniy Antonov
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Please tell me what I should do next by the process.
>>
>
> Thanks Arse
Hi everyone
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 3:27 PM Arseniy Antonov
wrote:
>
> Please tell me what I should do next by the process.
>
Thanks Arseniy for the interest.
The steps are written here:
https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.rst#submitting-plugins-to-pytest-dev
Mainly
Hi
> If you want to maintain your plugin under pytest-dev I think that should
> be fine as long as [0] is followed.
That's exactly what I want.
Please tell me what I should do next by the process.
чт, 2 мая 2019 г. в 20:44, Floris Bruynooghe :
> Hi Arseniy, Ronny,
>
> If you want to maintain you
Hi Arseniy, Ronny,
If you want to maintain your plugin under pytest-dev I think that should
be fine as long as [0] is followed. While indeed this doesn't mean
you'll magically have other maintainers it doesn't seem like that's what
you're after. So as long as the requirements are met this is pro
Hi Bruno,
On Wed 01 May 2019 at 17:25 -0300, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
> So my question is: how do the core maintainers feel about pytest joining
> Tidelift?
Thanks for the wait-and-see approach taken, I likewise have shifted my
opinion on this from some scepticism to mostly positive. So if there's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Florians,
> Any hints on which hooks would be most useful for gathering the failing
tests (or maybe a hint for existing code to look at)? Then I might write
that plugin :)
I suggest to take a look at the implementation of the LFPlugin, which use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
> Only thought from my side — please, just make sure there's "way back", in
case reality will not match your expectations.
Indeed that's a very important aspect, here's the section of the
agreement[1] regarding that:
- ---
6.2 How and when can this
On 2 May 2019, at 11:28, Florian Bruhin wrote:
Hey,
On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 11:22:08AM +0200, Florian Schulze wrote:
Is there a way to run a bunch of tests like with --lf but don't clear
the cache when they pass? This would be mighty helpful for git
bisect.
For now I helped myself by copying t
Hey,
On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 11:22:08AM +0200, Florian Schulze wrote:
> Is there a way to run a bunch of tests like with --lf but don't clear
> the cache when they pass? This would be mighty helpful for git bisect.
> For now I helped myself by copying the test ids, but that requires
> editing the
Hi!
Is there a way to run a bunch of tests like with --lf but don't clear
the cache when they pass? This would be mighty helpful for git bisect.
For now I helped myself by copying the test ids, but that requires
editing the list copied from the terminal before being able to paste
them to the comm
Em qui, 2 de mai de 2019 04:44, Florian Bruhin
escreveu:
> Hey,
>
> On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 05:25:58PM -0300, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
> > there were no obligations whatsoever after joining the platform other
> than
> > "maintain the project", which they were already doing anyway. There's no
> > obl
Hey,
On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 05:25:58PM -0300, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
> there were no obligations whatsoever after joining the platform other than
> "maintain the project", which they were already doing anyway. There's no
> obligation to market the platform in anyway as well (say, being forced to
>
On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 02:18:42PM +1200, Craig de Stigter wrote:
> This sort of works ( the marker is present by the time the test runs), but
> command-line filtering options (`-m 'not solr'`) don't filter based on it.
> I guess this hook is running after those options have been consulted?
>
> I
16 matches
Mail list logo
