Hi all,
pytest-capturelog has been abandoned [1] but is still getting used a lot
as far as i see. As it basically helps dealing with capturing logging
and logging is part of the python standard lib i think we could see
to merge it into pytest and maintain it from there. Is anyone up
for trying
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:24 +0200, Ronny Pfannschmidt wrote:
> Before we can merge it we need to restructure capturing, since logcapture
> currently incurs a huge perf cost (at least it did the last time we tried to
> merge it)
can't remember but ok :) On a cursory look it seems that capturel
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 6:43 AM holger krekel wrote:
> pytest-capturelog has been abandoned [1] but is still getting used a lot
> as far as i see.
Worth mentioning that there is a fork which is currently maintained,
pytest-catchlog [1].
If we are merging log capturing functionality, I think it
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:29 +, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 6:43 AM holger krekel wrote:
>
> > pytest-capturelog has been abandoned [1] but is still getting used a lot
> > as far as i see.
>
>
> Worth mentioning that there is a fork which is currently maintained,
> pyte
* holger krekel [2015-09-25 11:40:47 +]:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:29 +, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 6:43 AM holger krekel wrote:
> >
> > > pytest-capturelog has been abandoned [1] but is still getting used a lot
> > > as far as i see.
> >
> >
> > Worth mention
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 9:03 AM Florian Bruhin wrote:
> As I said there, I'm actually not sure if it should be merged, or at
> least not yet - it's finally starting to have some bugfixes and
> features compared to capturelog, and I plan to contribute some more
> stuff I need when I switched over
I think we should deal with logging in core, since its in the stdlib
Am 25. September 2015 14:16:20 MESZ, schrieb Bruno Oliveira
:
>On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 9:03 AM Florian Bruhin
>wrote:
>
>> As I said there, I'm actually not sure if it should be merged, or at
>> least not yet - it's finally sta
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 14:40 +0200, Ronny Pfannschmidt wrote:
> I think we should deal with logging in core, since its in the stdlib
I am fine with both -- leaving pytest-catchlog as 3rd party or
integrating it into core. FWIW pytest's release speed is not that bad
especially as we are automatin
If we give it a new name no need for compatible apis :)
Am 25. September 2015 19:55:26 MESZ, schrieb holger krekel :
>On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 14:40 +0200, Ronny Pfannschmidt wrote:
>> I think we should deal with logging in core, since its in the stdlib
>
>I am fine with both -- leaving pytest-catc
