Ronny Pfannschmidt writes:
> given the rightfully reasserted constraints that seems a reasonable
> course of action,
>
> i'd prefer to keep it reopened instead of won't fix,
> and i'd like to see a revising of the deprecation policy,
What we can do according to our policy is saying in our documen
Hi all,
this is a bit meta, as I have not enough insight about the topic at hand (I
did not follow the discussion closely), but as the one who proposed the
policy at the last sprint, I feel obliged to give my two cents about that
aspect of the discussion. I also try to give my perspective as a pyt
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:42:29AM +, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 3:49 PM Ronny Pfannschmidt <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 14.04.2017 14:17, Florian Bruhin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 05:51:34PM +, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
> > >> What if
Is anyone else at PyCon2017? Are there open issues we could work on during
the Sprints?
___
pytest-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev
