Hi everyone,
For some time now execnet has been in maintenance only mode, and even so
very few people are willing to maintain it; lately just myself and I’m not
a good choice given that I don’t know the codebase at all, plus I have tons
on my plate already. This poses a problem because often we ha
Hi,
I think having a simple `pytest-multiprocessing` or `pytest-concurrent`
would be extremely useful and cover a lot of people's use cases and would
strongly recommend to have that as a separate plugin from something bigger
that does feature hooks and/or remote execution.. It seems though as such
Hey,
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 09:45:48AM -0300, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
> Because of this, we have been discussing creating a new package,
> pytest-xdist2 (other suggestions are welcome), without any backward
> compatibility guarantees with pytest-xdist.
pytest-[yz]dist? ;)
> pytest-xdist2 would, a
Hi Freddy,
unfortunately pytest-concurrent is fundamentally broken for managing
fixtures and other details,
as things are my suggestion is to avoid it.
-- Ronny
Am 24.10.19 um 15:22 schrieb Rietdijk:
Hi,
I think having a simple `pytest-multiprocessing` or
`pytest-concurrent` would be ext
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff:Re: [pytest-dev] Future of pytest-xdist/execnet?
Datum: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:25:43 -0400
Von:[email protected]
An: [email protected]
Your message has been rejected, probably because you are not
subscribed t
Another one that might be worth taking a peek at is:
https://github.com/ansible/pytest-mp
I've never dug in personally but it always looked promising.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 4:22 PM RonnyPfannschmidt
wrote:
>
> Hi Freddy,
>
>
> unfortunately pytest-concurrent is fundamentally broken for managin
Just my 2c, I think I might would be valuable to create two new plugins:
- one which handles local concurrency via multiprocessing (pipes, shmem,
etc.)
- one which handles remote concurrency (sockets, client/server, etc.)
from a usage standpoint I expect the 99% to be the former suggested plug-in
Hi everyone,
in https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/pull/5975 i have startet to
prepare a POC with a ambitious goal,
i want to remove much of the mind boggling smartness from the constructors
and i want to streamline note constructors in order to reduce the
coupling in the different types of
Hi Ronny,
Thanks for all the hard work on this, I'm sure the final result will be as
good/valuable as all the internal mark refactoring.
Cheers,
Bruno
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 6:20 PM RonnyPfannschmidt <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> in https://github.com/pytest-dev/
pytest 5.2.2 has just been released to PyPI.
This is a bug-fix release, being a drop-in replacement. To upgrade::
pip install --upgrade pytest
The full changelog is available at
https://docs.pytest.org/en/latest/changelog.html.
Thanks to all who contributed to this release, among them:
* Alb
10 matches
Mail list logo
