Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> I'm frankly baffled by the amount of "protect users from incompatibility"
> ranting that this issue has generated. If I wanted to use Java, I'd know
> where to find it. Guido has said time and again that Python's balance
> favors the individual developer at the expense
Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> Would a possible special method name __methodcall__ be accepted, where
>> if it exists on a callable, you can expect to use it as __call__ but
>> with the understanding that it accepts as self when called in
>> an optimizable form? This would reduce the method call to tw
Hi,
I haven't read all the thread because it's pretty long, but if I have
well understood
Paul and what is my opinion (and why I use docstring in my own
typecheker module)
is that it's a good idea to not mix function definition and its type.
I think the difference between langages is not what they
